On 2011-01-02 7:26 PM, Bernhard Dippold wrote:
> But as this mail is buried under a huge discussion, she/he should start
> a new thread, ask for co-workers, define the test documents and help us
> all with the results.
As I have suggested many times in the past, there needs to be a
*dedicated* pla
Hi,
Bernhard Dippold wrote
>>
>> It would be good to have some test documents, to convert them from one of
>> the formats to the others and find out the best interoperability solution
>> for the present versions of the different software packages.
>>
I have a set of documents covering 36 basic i
On Sun Jan 02 2011 18:43:41 GMT-0800 (PST) Andy Brown wrote:
On Sun Jan 02 2011 18:31:07 GMT-0800 (PST) todd rme wrote:
Koffice (I guess Calligra now) already has a set of ms office test
documents. See here:
http://158.36.191.251:8080/viewLog.html?buildId=1745&buildTypeId=bt7&tab=testsInfo
On Sun Jan 02 2011 18:31:07 GMT-0800 (PST) todd rme wrote:
Koffice (I guess Calligra now) already has a set of ms office test
documents. See here:
http://158.36.191.251:8080/viewLog.html?buildId=1745&buildTypeId=bt7&tab=testsInfo
Rather than getting your own set of test documents, I think it
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Bernhard Dippold
wrote:
> Hi Barbara, all,
>
> Barbara Duprey schrieb:
>>
>> On 1/2/2011 2:29 PM, Italo Vignoli wrote:
>>>
>>> On 1/2/11 8:15 PM, Barbara Duprey wrote:
>>>
Italo, one of the things that would make me (and maybe others here) feel
better abou
Hi Barbara, all,
Barbara Duprey schrieb:
On 1/2/2011 2:29 PM, Italo Vignoli wrote:
On 1/2/11 8:15 PM, Barbara Duprey wrote:
Italo, one of the things that would make me (and maybe others here) feel
better about OOXML support is if writing to the XP formats causes LibO
to make compromises that
