Hi NoOp, *,
I appreciate Your initiative..
Am 08.09.2011 02:16 schrieb NoOp:
For those that continue to insist on top posting on the LO lists: please
consider bottom posting with interspersed replies.
Those who insist, won't consider. I think it's a good Idea to provide
those with kind of
On Thursday 08 Sep 2011 01:16:27 NoOp wrote:
For those that continue to insist on top posting on the LO lists: please
consider bottom posting with interspersed replies.
[trimmed excellent discussion of the merits of trimming and interspersing
replies]
NoOp, I applaud your attempt to get some
The links do not lead me to assume that top posting is expected. If the
documentation group desires bottom posting only, the user should be
informed when the register. Even then, I expect that most people will
miss it. Expecting someone to follow a link and then follow another link
seems a
Yeah! A man without unnecessary limitations.
I believe cropping is a solution to the problem.
I understand, but dislike being forced to read
the whole thread. There is an argument for
reading the whole thing but I believe that
it does not need to be dogma.
regards,
Richard.
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011
On 09/09/2011 10:01 PM, Richard wrote:
Yeah! A man without unnecessary limitations.
Sadly, I have many unnecessary limitations :-)
--
Andrew Pitonyak
My Macro Document: http://www.pitonyak.org/AndrewMacro.odt
Info: http://www.pitonyak.org/oo.php
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
There is one thing more irritating than top posting. People who rant about it.
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 7:16 AM, NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
For those that continue to insist on top posting on the LO lists: please
consider bottom posting with interspersed replies.
I realiz(s)e that the
For those that continue to insist on top posting on the LO lists: please
consider bottom posting with interspersed replies.
I realiz(s)e that the existing:
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/
doesn't specifically clarify anything with regards to top/bottom
posting. However at the
