On 2011-10-20 4:52 AM, Mélodie wrote:
I've used Quote Colors for quite some time, at each update of TB I get
error messages, then mysteriously all starts to work again within a
couple of days without any intervention from my part, and without an
update to QC (is working at the moment).
It is c
Le 10/09/11 13:31, Ken Springer a écrit :
Seriously, though, I checked the source for your message, and we both
are using Thunderbird 6.
Within the last week, I learned about the QuoteCollapse add-on. It
takes each quoted section of a reply, and collapses it to one line.
There's a little
When folks choose not to follow those rules, the system breaks down
and less gets accomplished.
Just spent the last hour deleting spam, freezing spammer accounts,
disallowing spammer IP addresses on an OOo Forum, come here and see
people still arguing about top or bottom posting
Sorr
Hi,
Just to add to the mix. My email client on android always makes me
top-post, adding the original post on the bottom. It is interesting that
people take the posting style so personally when they have not got enough
information. It is quite alright to give me (or people who use Androids)
spec
Excuse me. I didn't start this thread.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Mark Wielaard [mailto:m...@klomp.org]
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2011 01:03
To: discuss@documentfoundation.org
Subject: RE: [tdf-discuss] Re: Top Posting... Can we have an LO Mailing List
Guidelines Page?
Dear Dennis,
On Sun, October 2, 2011 22:00, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> Mark, I think my question was concrete and very clear:
> "> > How about you just read the goddamn RFC's for email protocol and stop
> "> > whining about it?
> "> Which RFC's are you talking about? Numbers please.
>
> I don't
Oh my, not this again... I should write a plug-in that detects bottom /
top posting and then either:
Filters the type you do not like, or, moves all top / bottom postings to
the bottom / top.
If there is sufficient time to argue this, can someone perhaps stop by
and help me flatten some bo
rks.org/>
dennis.hamil...@acm.org gsm: +1-206-779-9430 @orcmid
-Original Message-
From: Mark Wielaard [mailto:m...@klomp.org]
Sent: Sunday, October 02, 2011 11:59
To: discuss@documentfoundation.org
Subject: RE: [tdf-discuss] Re: Top Posting... Can we have an LO Mailing List
G
Hi,
On Sun, October 2, 2011 20:29, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> > How about you just read the goddamn RFC's for email protocol and stop
> > whining about it?
> Which RFC's are you talking about? Numbers please.
Please don't top-post (fixed it for you in this message).
I assume the reference is t
Which RFC's are you talking about? Numbers please.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Mark Preston [mailto:m...@mpreston.demon.co.uk]
Sent: Sunday, October 02, 2011 06:12
To: discuss@documentfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Top Posting... Can we have an LO Mailing
14:03
> To: discuss@documentfoundation.org
> Subject: Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Top Posting... Can we have an LO Mailing List
> Guidelines Page?
>
> On 30 September 2011 02:46, NoOp wrote:
>
>> I must say that I *am* surprised that LO haven't the technical/political
>> ability/ten
-Original Message-
From: Tim Schofield [mailto:t...@weberpafrica.com]
Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2011 14:03
To: discuss@documentfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Top Posting... Can we have an LO Mailing List
Guidelines Page?
On 30 September 2011 02:46, NoOp wrote:
>
On 30 September 2011 02:46, NoOp wrote:
> I must say that I *am* surprised that LO haven't the technical/political
> ability/tenacity to properly post information regarding this issue in
> the same manner as the links provided (OOo, Mozilla, Ubuntu, et al).
>
It may be possible they have importa
Hi Gary,
NoOp wrote (30-09-11 03:46)
After all that + discussions on the -user list it seems that LO doesn't
really care to provide any specific rules/regulations/FAQ regarding
Top/Interspersed/Bottom posting on any of their lists.
[...]
Has not yet been forgotten.
But to manage expectations
On 2011-09-12 8:42 PM, Robert Holtzman wrote:
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 05:06:49PM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2011-09-11 9:47 PM, Ken Springer wrote:
Even if they did push it through, if no one enforces the eventual rule,
the time will be wasted. I'd prefer interspersion, as I almost always
ha
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 05:06:49PM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2011-09-11 9:47 PM, Ken Springer wrote:
> >Even if they did push it through, if no one enforces the eventual rule,
> >the time will be wasted. I'd prefer interspersion, as I almost always
> >have to scroll around somewhere in order t
On 2011-09-11 9:47 PM, Ken Springer wrote:
Even if they did push it through, if no one enforces the eventual rule,
the time will be wasted. I'd prefer interspersion, as I almost always
have to scroll around somewhere in order to remember what was being
replied to.
Most people who advocate for
On 2011-09-10 7:31 AM, Ken Springer wrote:
At this point, this add-on would seem to eliminate the need of trimming,
too.
No, no, NO... trimming should still be required.
All QuoteCollapse does is spare me a lot of pain when I encounter morons
who refuse to trim posts...
--
Unsubscribe inst
On 09/10/2011 07:31 AM, Ken Springer wrote:
On 9/9/11 11:24 PM, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
On 09/09/2011 06:05 PM, Ken Springer wrote:
Read it many times. I remain unconvinced. Their points assume a single
style of reading email.
I don't think I agree totally. I think their points appl
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 05:31:50AM -0600, Ken Springer wrote:
..snip.
>
> At this point, this add-on would seem to eliminate the need of
> trimming, too.
Of course that would screw non-TB users.
snip
--
Bob Holtzman
If you think you're getti
On 09/09/2011 06:05 PM, Ken Springer wrote:
On 9/9/11 3:40 PM, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
The links do not lead me to assume that top posting is expected. If the
documentation group desires bottom posting only, the user should be
informed when the register. Even then, I expect that most pe
21 matches
Mail list logo