Hi,
maybe I put it the wrong way. Of course, there are always services that are
inly available with ads, then we sometimes have no choice. However, when
thinking about eithe modifying existing services that have ads, to fit our
needs, like for a forum, or to setup our own without ads, I have a
On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 15:34 +0100, Florian Effenberger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> ads, independent to what they advertise for, are basically a no go for me.
>
Howdy Florian
right, well I have no doubt of the sincerity behind that comment, but it
does get a bit dicey in practice IMO.
For instance very f
Hi,
ads, independent to what they advertise for, are basically a no go for me.
Florian
*** This message has been sent from my tablet. Please excuse the possible
briefness.
Augustine Souza schrieb:
>On 11/8/11, drew wrote:
>...
>>
>> Right, LibreOfficeForum.org was almost first out of the
Hi Augustine, *,
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 7:42 AM, Augustine Souza wrote:
> On 11/8/11, drew wrote:
>
> en.libreofficeforum.org is not too shabby at all and would serve the purpose.
>
> If I remember there was some opposition to Google ads featuring
> competing software but that's really a non-iss
On 08/11/2011 07:42, Augustine Souza wrote:
On 11/8/11, drew wrote:
...
Right, LibreOfficeForum.org was almost first out of the gate, but there
has been a certain amount of resistance to referring users to the site
from the main projects web properties.
...
en.libreofficeforum.org is not too
On 11/8/11, drew wrote:
...
>
> Right, LibreOfficeForum.org was almost first out of the gate, but there
> has been a certain amount of resistance to referring users to the site
> from the main projects web properties.
>
...
en.libreofficeforum.org is not too shabby at all and would serve the purp
On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 17:07 -0500, drew wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 06:20 +0900, Kazunari Hirano wrote:
> > Hi Ken and all,
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 2:26 AM, Ken Springer wrote:
> > > I will once again say, that of all the open source programs I've tried and
> > > would like to use, LO i
On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 06:20 +0900, Kazunari Hirano wrote:
> Hi Ken and all,
>
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 2:26 AM, Ken Springer wrote:
> > I will once again say, that of all the open source programs I've tried and
> > would like to use, LO is far and away the best organization at providing a
> > hel
Hi Ken and all,
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 2:26 AM, Ken Springer wrote:
> I will once again say, that of all the open source programs I've tried and
> would like to use, LO is far and away the best organization at providing a
> help system for everyone.
You are right. But http://wiki.documentfounda
Hi,
Tom Hart wrote on 2011-11-07 02:11:
Maybe this looks more like a forum?
http://arkanis.de/projects#nntp-forum
https://github.com/arkanis/nntp-forum
The key idea here is to have an etablished system newsgroup under the
hood (for the more "conserative" users) and a fancy webinterface forum
(
Hi,
Marc Paré wrote on 2011-11-04 18:06:
Once the forums is definitely OK'd and once the decision on whether it
will be an EN forums only (which is what I think you are talking about)
or multiple languages, we should just make a call for help on all lists.
I definitely plan, should we go with
Hi,
Christian Lohmaier wrote on 2011-11-03 16:17:
You cannot move threads to other topics, you cannot edit messages
afterwards, you cannot delete posts, you cannot mark posts as sticky
or "resolved", etc.
indeed, good points. However, I am not sure if this is what the majority
of users would
On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 16:17 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> Hi *,
>
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Florian Effenberger
> wrote:
> > Ken Springer wrote on 2011-11-02 22:48:
> >>
> >> If you prefer your help system to be a forum, that's available through
> >> the Nabble interface and Gmane.
Hi *,
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Florian Effenberger
wrote:
> Ken Springer wrote on 2011-11-02 22:48:
>>
>> If you prefer your help system to be a forum, that's available through
>> the Nabble interface and Gmane.
>
> sadly, Nabble is not seen as forum at all.
Yes, because it is none.
> I
On Nov 3, 2011, Florian Effenberger wrote:
"sadly, Nabble is not seen as forum at all. I don't know why, but many
- especially novice - users have complained and do not use Nabble. My
wish was indeed to have this forum-style gateway to have access to the
same content with two interfaces, but it obv
Hello,
Ken Springer wrote on 2011-11-02 22:48:
If you prefer your help system to be a forum, that's available through
the Nabble interface and Gmane.
sadly, Nabble is not seen as forum at all. I don't know why, but many -
especially novice - users have complained and do not use Nabble. My wis
I understand the logic. I am not too happy about it, but there is no
perfect solution, as you pointed out.
I like the Shapado site. I am not sure we can vote up answers, which I
think is a killer feature. If that is there, it would have my blessing for
an official Q&A. I guess we can worry about m
Hi,
Am 01.11.2011 05:45, schrieb Marc Paré:
> If de.openoffice.org is "awarded" the care of
> the LibreOffice maintenance of the forums, there will be those
> who will complain about it as not being a real native LibreOffice
> forums. If the TDF raises its own forums, then there will those
> who
+1 for open id.
Sorry for the extra email... my phone's touch screen is a bit off
sometimes.
On 30 Oct 2011 13:49, "Marc Paré" wrote:
Le 2011-10-30 11:40, Florian Effenberger a écrit :
>
> Single sign-on is indeed something I'd like to see soon, but there are
> no concrete plans as o...
OpenId
+
On 30 Oct 2011 13:49, "Marc Paré" wrote:
Le 2011-10-30 11:40, Florian Effenberger a écrit :
>
> Single sign-on is indeed something I'd like to see soon, but there are
> no concrete plans as o...
OpenId is the option that users would be most familiar, there are many
sites using it. Doing LDAP
On 30/10/2011 16:40, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hi,
Jonathan Aquilina wrote on 2011-10-29 14:55:
If you opt to name one as an official TDF mirror it wont take me a
second to setup a TDF section and LO section for use.
what is the URL of your existing forum, so I can have a look?
I am wonder
On 30/10/2011 16:40, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hi,
Jonathan Aquilina wrote on 2011-10-29 14:55:
If you opt to name one as an official TDF mirror it wont take me a
second to setup a TDF section and LO section for use.
what is the URL of your existing forum, so I can have a look?
I am wonder
Hi,
Jonathan Aquilina wrote on 2011-10-29 14:55:
If you opt to name one as an official TDF mirror it wont take me a
second to setup a TDF section and LO section for use.
what is the URL of your existing forum, so I can have a look?
I am wondering though if you go for self hosted solution i a
Hi Dennis,
Dennis E. Hamilton wrote (29-10-11 20:47)
I am also not aware of any discussion that was antagonistic to TDF
whatsoever among those involved with finding a resolution for the
migration of the OOo Forums to a reliable hosting. The key objection
was to preserve and continue that valuab
Hi Italo,
Italo Vignoli wrote (29-10-11 11:26)
LibreOffice is going forward and bringing new features to users, with an
increasingly different code base. OOo is going backwards, [...]
From what I've seen the past year, I am not positive too about OO,
especially not compared to LibreOffice. B
Hi Olivier,
Olivier R. wrote (29-10-11 10:16)
Forums administrators and volonteers have always claim to be
non-discriminative. They support all versions of the software: LibreOffice,
OpenOffice.org, NeoOffice, etc. And almost all of us have already switched
to LibreOffice. Is it really necessar
Saturday, October 29, 2011 02:54
To: discuss@documentfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?
Le 29/10/2011 11:37, Olivier R. a écrit :
> Hello Charles,
>
>> providing mailing lists seems to mean that we don't
>> respect forums
>
> No. You are twisting
On 10/29/2011 11:37 AM, Olivier R. wrote:
Did TDF offer to host forums ?
Yes
--
Italo Vignoli
italo.vign...@gmail.com
mobile +39.348.5653829
VoIP +39.02.320621813
skype italovignoli
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.or
On 29/10/2011 14:38, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
Jonathan Aquilina wrote on 2011-10-29 14:33:
I am more then willing to volunteer a section on my forums for
Libreoffice and the TDF discussion and support as well. I am using phpbb
for the forums though :(
thanks a lot for that offe
Hi Jonathan,
Jonathan Aquilina wrote on 2011-10-29 14:33:
I am more then willing to volunteer a section on my forums for
Libreoffice and the TDF discussion and support as well. I am using phpbb
for the forums though :(
thanks a lot for that offer. If we, however, decide for TDF forums, I
then
On 29/10/2011 14:30, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hello,
Stefan Weigel wrote on 2011-10-29 11:35:
It´s not a matter of low respect. It´s just not necessary to mess
around and create yet another forum, since there are already
well-settled forums, driven by the community, that fully cover
LibreOffi
Hello,
Stefan Weigel wrote on 2011-10-29 11:35:
It´s not a matter of low respect. It´s just not necessary to mess
around and create yet another forum, since there are already
well-settled forums, driven by the community, that fully cover
LibreOffice.;-)
the points raised by Italo are not inval
Le 29/10/2011 11:37, Olivier R. a écrit :
> Hello Charles,
>
>> providing mailing lists seems to mean that we don't
>> respect forums
>
> No. You are twisting what I said.
Perhaps, but I actually heard a similar argument about "the lack of
respect" to the forums (but apparently you make a diff
Hi,
Am 29.10.2011 10:16, schrieb Olivier R.:
> Forums administrators and volonteers have always claim to be
> non-discriminative. They support all versions of the software: LibreOffice,
> OpenOffice.org, NeoOffice, etc.
That´s correct. And that´s why the following is *not* correct:
> TDF has a
On 10/29/2011 10:16 AM, Olivier R. wrote:
AFAIK, forums migrated on Apache server only because TDF has always favored
mailing-lists and seemed to have low respect for forums. Before Apache, TDF
seemed not concerned with forums hosting.
When we started the project in 2010, "human" bandwidth was
Hello Olivier,
Le 29/10/2011 10:16, Olivier R. a écrit :
> Hello Cor,
>
>
> Cor Nouws wrote:
>>
>> So apart from that it is maybe not fair ;-) to profit too much on the
>> work of the forums at Apache (when life), it will be increasingly
>> insufficient for our own users.
>>
>
> Forums admini
36 matches
Mail list logo
