I guess what Thorsten means is that in the case of the board discuss list
Nabble might be misconfigured. Jean Weber and David Nelson posted on it
less than a month ago, so at least it works with the standard mailing list
usage. Besides the BoD always intended to make this list a list where
members
Thorsten Behrens wrote
> No idea - if you subscribe via
> board-discuss+subscribe@
> , you can post w/o
> moderation, like on every other TDF mailing list. Nabble
> misconfiguration?
It is not a misconfiguration. It is a different configuration.
I think you are misinterpreting the words "Public
Pedro wrote:
> I'm not sure that is the idea. Otherwise you would not get the following
> message when you try to post to that list on Nabble
>
> " Authorized Users Only
> Only authorized users can proceed in this area. You can use the form below
> to send a request to the administrators.
> Access
Thorsten Behrens wrote
> terribly sorry if we ever gave that impression. Admittedly, the
> entry on http://www.documentfoundation.org/contribution/ was worded
> like that ("Public discussions of the Board of Directors"), but I'm
> rather certain it should read "List for focused interaction of the
>
Marc Paré wrote:
> Thanks. I am subscribed to that list, but was not aware that the
> membership was allowed to join in. I thought that that particular
> list was for board discussion only by board members only.
>
Hi Marc,
terribly sorry if we ever gave that impression. Admittedly, the
entry on h
