to handle that situation. Should we consider to
go the KISS way - not only with this issue but rather with other
decisions within the project as well?
And again: anyone interested in joining to improve the source of advice?
Gruß/regards
Friedrich
--
Friedrich Strohmaier
- Admin team -
The Document
which one.
-1
Wrong assumption?
Gruß/regards
Friedrich
--
Friedrich Strohmaier
- Admin team -
The Document Foundation
http://www.documentfoundation.org/
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how
Hi Regina, *,
Am 30.11.2011 16:53 schrieb Regina Henschel:
Friedrich Strohmaier schrieb:
[..]
No. This can happen if accidently a poster uses reply to all instead
of reply-to-list, without trimming the posters address.
I use Seamonkey and there I see nothing like reply-to-list
not the question.
The question is, where to go regarding communication style.
reply-to mangling hereby is *one* thing to look at.
Gruß/regards
Friedrich
--
Friedrich Strohmaier
- Admin team -
The Document Foundation
http://www.documentfoundation.org/
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h
Hi Florian, *,
Am 09.12.2011 12:07 schrieb Florian Effenberger:
I like your idea to use the website list however, since people there are
usually much experienced in using technology and e-mail.
So, what do others think about that? Disabling reply-to mangling (after
announcement) on the
Hi Michael, *,
Am 06.12.2011 09:40 schrieb Michael Meeks:
[..]
Anyways, which lists would you like to start trying it on?
The one I'd like to interact with from time to time don't is the
website list :-) but I'd expect the same noise there ...
Hi Florian, *,
Am 12.12.2011 14:41 schrieb Florian Effenberger:
Friedrich Strohmaier wrote on 2011-12-11 15:22:
So well, I've some questions:
- What makes the website list more suitable for this test than this one?
- What are the criteria making this test successful or fail?
nothing
Hi Pedro, *,
Am 22.01.2012 13:43 schrieb Pedro:
[..]
I just think it that it doesn't make sense to change things that users
rely on just because you can.
+1
Gruß/regards
--
Friedrich
Libreoffice-Box http://libreofficebox.org/
LibreOffice and more on CD/DVD images
--
Unsubscribe
Hi Andreas, *,
first excuse me for crossposting, but I want to get more volunteers
aware of this topic and involved in it.
Please don't ask for apology doing a mistake - just do better ;o)).
If You think, exactly the same information is required on two lists,
then send two identical mails,
Hi Gordon, *,
On 13/04/2012 12:46, Marc-André Laverdière wrote:
One of the concerns I have, though, is in terms of usability... would
asking the default mail client to handle thousands of emails make the
client freeze? Would it be automated nicely, so that the user doesn't
have to click on
Hi Michael, *,
Am 19.09.2012 11:32 schrieb Michael Meeks:
On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 22:10 +0200, Friedrich Strohmaier wrote:
I'm not against having paid officers in general, but they should do meta
tasks, i.e. rather looking for people doing necessary work - for example
by poking sponsors
Hi Olivier, *,
Olivier Hallot schrieb:
Em 14-01-2011 16:16, Tom Davies escreveu:
OTOH if people use the email address per...@openoffice.org then it
gets the name OpenOffice out there and being seen by a lot of
people. Free advertising!
+1
For some people this is even a matter of pride,
Hi Charles, *,
Who is it, You agree?
Charles-H. Schulz schrieb:
Le Sat, 15 Jan 2011 21:23:02 +0100, Friedrich Strohmaier
damokles4-lis...@bits-fritz.de a écrit :
Olivier Hallot schrieb:
Em 14-01-2011 16:16, Tom Davies escreveu:
OTOH if people use the email address per...@openoffice.org
Hi Florian, *,
Florian Effenberger schrieb:
[.. add free doodle ..]
I'd like to keep the ad-freeness, it's not that annoying and looks
much more professional. Anyone knows of a solution that does this for
free? Moreganize is much better IMHO, but they don't support
timezones yet, and I
Hi Olivier, @ll,
Olivier C schrieb:
On Sat, 2011-03-12 at 14:48 +0100, Florian Effenberger wrote:
this topic was raised on the website list, and my gut feeling says
it would be a good idea to show our support.
What do you think?
[..]
Please focus on the Document Foundation. TDF neither
Hi Florian, *,
Am 26.10.2011 15:32 schrieb Florian Effenberger:
since the Steering Committee will soon cease its existence, and the
newly elected BoD will be officially in charge, I would like to rename
this list.
My proposal would either be:
1. core-discuss@tdf
2. board-discuss@tdf
3.
thoughts to throw in.
This touches several topics which I will handle within several mails:
- Current state and needs of the admin team
- Work to be done by TDF officers - strategy
- Budget - assignment and coverage
Friedrich
--
Friedrich Strohmaier
- Admin team -
The Document Foundation
http
Hi All,
As the infrastructure team by design is working in the background[1]
I'll pass some information for the public.
[1] We're proud if nobody notes our work! ;o))
I'll try to keep it short..
Am 18.09.2012 19:56 schrieb Friedrich Strohmaier:
Am 17.09.2012 18:06 schrieb Thorsten Behrens
Hi all,
again trying to keep it short..
Am 18.09.2012 19:56 schrieb Friedrich Strohmaier:
Am 17.09.2012 18:06 schrieb Thorsten Behrens:
[..]
A thing of note is §8 - the board intends to hire or contract
someone to operate infrastructure on a daily basis, acknowledging
the extraordinary
Hi all,
again trying to keep it short..
Am 18.09.2012 19:56 schrieb Friedrich Strohmaier:
Am 17.09.2012 18:06 schrieb Thorsten Behrens:
[..]
A thing of note is §8 - the board intends to hire or contract
someone to operate infrastructure on a daily basis, acknowledging
the extraordinary
, who
helps kick off activities which are considered necessary but were not
mounted yet.
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:15 PM, Friedrich Strohmaier
bitsfr...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
[..]
Friedrich
--
Friedrich Strohmaier
- Admin team -
The Document Foundation
http
101 - 121 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
