Re: [jQuery] Bug in $() in jQuery v1.1.1?

2007-02-03 Thread Stéphane Nahmani
On 3 févr. 07, at 14:13, Jörn Zaefferer wrote: > Could you please try the latest revision of jQuery? I've uploaded it > here, in case you don't have svn access: Actually i don't. I tried with this version, and the issue remains as before. I'm wondering if this could be related to the fact that

Re: [jQuery] Bug in $() in jQuery v1.1.1?

2007-02-03 Thread Jörn Zaefferer
Stéphane Nahmani schrieb: > Thanks for the new version. However, the issue is still the same if i > use the SVN modified version of JQuery (unpacked). > I'm sending you a coupl of screenshots offlist, so you can see what i > mean. > Could you please try the latest revision of jQuery? I've up

Re: [jQuery] Bug in $() in jQuery v1.1.1?

2007-02-03 Thread Stéphane Nahmani
On 3 févr. 07, at 12:50, Jörn Zaefferer wrote: > Could you try version 1.1 of the plugin? > http://bassistance.de/jquery-plugins/jquery-plugin-accordion/ > > It should work fine now. Hello Jörn, Thanks for the new version. However, the issue is still the same if i use the SVN modified version

Re: [jQuery] Bug in $() in jQuery v1.1.1?

2007-02-03 Thread Jörn Zaefferer
Stéphane Nahmani schrieb: > On 30 janv. 07, at 22:27, Jörn Zaefferer wrote: > > >> In case you want to test it with your copy of jQuery, modify pushStack >> to look like this: >> >> pushStack: function( a ) { >> var ret = jQuery(a); >> ret.prevObject = this; >> return ret; >> }, >

Re: [jQuery] Bug in $() in jQuery v1.1.1?

2007-02-02 Thread Jörn Zaefferer
Stéphane Nahmani schrieb: > Fwiw, i modified my jquery.js with this, and discovered that it broke the > Accordion plugin somewhat. I use Accordion with a setting to start with no > submenu open: > > $(".deroulant").Accordion({ > header: 'a.pliant', > active: 'false' > }); > > and after maki

Re: [jQuery] Bug in $() in jQuery v1.1.1?

2007-02-02 Thread Stéphane Nahmani
On 30 janv. 07, at 22:27, Jörn Zaefferer wrote: > In case you want to test it with your copy of jQuery, modify pushStack > to look like this: > > pushStack: function( a ) { > var ret = jQuery(a); > ret.prevObject = this; > return ret; > }, Fwiw, i modified my jquery.js with this

Re: [jQuery] Bug in $() in jQuery v1.1.1?

2007-01-30 Thread John Resig
> Yes, that does indeed fix the problem! I guess I should have searched the > archives better. I don't think it was mentioned on the mailing list - we hunted it down and destroyed it on IRC, I think. Don't feel bad :-) --John ___ jQuery mailing list di

Re: [jQuery] Bug in $() in jQuery v1.1.1?

2007-01-30 Thread Dan G. Switzer, II
Jörn, >In case you want to test it with your copy of jQuery, modify pushStack >to look like this: > >pushStack: function( a ) { > var ret = jQuery(a); > ret.prevObject = this; > return ret; >}, Yes, that does indeed fix the problem! I guess I should have searched the archives be

Re: [jQuery] Bug in $() in jQuery v1.1.1?

2007-01-30 Thread Jörn Zaefferer
John Resig schrieb: > Dan - > > I'm fairly certain that this has already been fixed in SVN, by Joern. > It was an issue with the fact that [0] had a value, while .length was > set to 0. > > Maybe Joern can confirm that this has, in fact, been fixed. > From what I can see in the example code, th

Re: [jQuery] Bug in $() in jQuery v1.1.1?

2007-01-30 Thread John Resig
Dan - I'm fairly certain that this has already been fixed in SVN, by Joern. It was an issue with the fact that [0] had a value, while .length was set to 0. Maybe Joern can confirm that this has, in fact, been fixed. --John On 1/30/07, Dan G. Switzer, II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've got the

[jQuery] Bug in $() in jQuery v1.1.1?

2007-01-30 Thread Dan G. Switzer, II
I've got the following test case that performs quite a bit different between v1.0.4 and v1.1.1. In the code below v1.0.4 returns an undefined object for both test cases--which certainly seems like it would be the expected behavior (I mean if an element doesn't exist, it shouldn't be returned.) Al