>> I am pretty sure I don't have any code that would be broken by the new
>> behavior. The entire test suite passes with it, although that may be
>> more an indictment of the test suite than a stamp of approval. :-)
>
> I'm sure we can write some test that will break when changing
> the destructi
> I have read Jon's post about a solution to the destructive calls.
> Being late to the game, I am confused as to the meaning of all this.
> I sort of understand that some calls are queries and others change
> things, but what is the impact of this that requires a solution? Is
> there a thr
I have read Jon's post about a solution to the destructive calls.
Being late to the game, I am confused as to the meaning of all this.
I sort of understand that some calls are queries and others change
things, but what is the impact of this that requires a solution? Is
there a thread someon
> I am pretty sure I don't have any code that would be broken by the new
> behavior. The entire test suite passes with it, although that may be more
> an
> indictment of the test suite than a stamp of approval. :-)
I'm sure we can write some test that will break when changing the destructive
beha
Dave Methvin
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 11:48 AM
To: 'jQuery Discussion.'
Subject: Re: [jQuery] Non-destructive jQuery
>> I'd really like to see John's modifications to pushStack
>> included in the jQuery core. Details here:
>> http://www.nabble.com/Non-D
>> I'd really like to see John's modifications to pushStack
>> included in the jQuery core. Details here:
>> http://www.nabble.com/Non-Destructive-jQuery-tf2482924.html
>>
>> I'm actually wondering if that modification would break any
>> existing code, as end() works like before. I guess the onl
Someone who didn't understand jQuery's destructiveness might have done something like that by accident (cached a jQuery object, used a destructive operation, and then reused the cached object under the assumption that it wasn't destructive. It might not matter, or someone in this situation might ha
ussion.
Subject: Re: [jQuery] Non-destructive jQuery
> I use multiple destructive functions all the time:
>
> $('#share').children().not('h2').hide().end().end().slideUp('normal');
>
> They're very useful when you need to set up specific elemen
> I use multiple destructive functions all the time:
>
> $('#share').children().not('h2').hide().end().end().slideUp('normal');
>
> They're very useful when you need to set up specific elements within a
> container before doing something with the container itself.
Ok, but that will still work wi
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of "Jörn Zaefferer"
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 9:46 AM
To: jQuery Discussion.
Subject: [jQuery] Non-destructive jQuery
Hi folks,
I'd really like to see John's modifications to pus
Hi folks,
I'd really like to see John's modifications to pushStack included in the jQuery
core. Details here: http://www.nabble.com/Non-Destructive-jQuery-tf2482924.html
I'm actually wondering if that modification would break any existing code, as
end() works like before. I guess the only situa
> Just an optimization, but it would be good to have the
> .destructiveMethod(selector, function) case not create a new object since it
> doesn't (permanently) change the original object. It looks like _pushStack
> will stack the old jQuery object's nodes in the new jQuery object, which it
> won't
i am grateful that you have been able to contain the destructive power of
jquery with such little code
John Resig wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone -
>
> There's been some rabble-rousing concerning the destructive nature of
> jQuery (it's ok, rousing is a good thing ;-)). I claimed that it'd be
> easy t
> There's been some rabble-rousing concerning the destructive
> nature of jQuery (it's ok, rousing is a good thing ;-)). I claimed
> that it'd be easy to have it exist as a plugin. Well, it took me
> all of 10 minutes, but here it is:
>
> jQuery.fn._pushStack = jQuery.fn.pushStack;
>
Hi Everyone -
There's been some rabble-rousing concerning the destructive nature of
jQuery (it's ok, rousing is a good thing ;-)). I claimed that it'd be
easy to have it exist as a plugin. Well, it took me all of 10 minutes,
but here it is:
jQuery.fn._pushStack = jQuery.fn.pushStack;
15 matches
Mail list logo
