Brice Burgess schrieb:
> Jörn Zaefferer wrote:
>
>> Actually I was referring to the use of metadata ;-)
>>
>> The metadata plugin was the result of a pretty long discussion about the
>> best approach on metadata, a lot of brainpower went into that one :-)
>>
>>
>>
> Any chance on integr
can you just upload the correct files with the correct versions so ill can
test if its my problem?
zip it to somewhere and ill be happy to report you
and i didnt realise how to fix the "known issues " of ie6 bugs...
great work!
Jörn Zaefferer wrote:
>
> amircx schrieb:
>> is anyone here tried
Jörn Zaefferer wrote:
> Actually I was referring to the use of metadata ;-)
>
> The metadata plugin was the result of a pretty long discussion about the
> best approach on metadata, a lot of brainpower went into that one :-)
>
>
Any chance on integrating this into the core API? I think it would
Fil schrieb:
>> Since jQuery 1.1.2, there are no more browser
>> issues with that format. Whether you use it or not is your choice, the
>> recommended alternative is settings validation rules via plugin options.
>>
>
> I *will* use it, that's why I asked these questions :) Glad to see
> they
amircx schrieb:
> is anyone here tried to run this code on ie6 ? i wonder if its just my
> browser or the versions of the files are incorrect
>
I'm testing the plugin in Firefox 2, IE6 & 7 and Opera 9.1. Apart from
the issues reported on the plugin page, I never experienced any
problems. And t
Fil schrieb:
>> http://bassistance.de/jquery-plugins/jquery-plugin-validation/
>>
>
> Oh it's great.
>
> I wonder though if your choice of writing class="{x:y;z:t}" is not
> potentially problematic.
>
> As I see it:
> - it could be incompatible with CSS2.1 selectors
> - it is probably incompat
Paul Bakaus schrieb:
> Hi Jörn,
>
> just a minor issue:
> The text "Please accept our policy" after clicking submit on the
> second form will not vanish directly after checking the checkbox.
> Other than that, great work!
Good point. A click of course isn't a keyup, so that doesn't work. Again
yo
> Since jQuery 1.1.2, there are no more browser
> issues with that format. Whether you use it or not is your choice, the
> recommended alternative is settings validation rules via plugin options.
I *will* use it, that's why I asked these questions :) Glad to see
they have already been thought thr
Stefan Kilp [sk-software] schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> testing demoform "validating a complete from"
>
> i entered 123456 in password field, then entered 11 in confirm password
> which leads to a warning "please enter the same password as above" which is
> correct.
> now i enter 11 in password field
Hi Jörn,
just a minor issue:
The text "Please accept our policy" after clicking submit on the second form
will not vanish directly after checking the checkbox.
Other than that, great work!
-Paul
2007/3/7, amircx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
is anyone here tried to run this code on ie6 ? i wonder if
is anyone here tried to run this code on ie6 ? i wonder if its just my
browser or the versions of the files are incorrect
fil-4 wrote:
>
>> http://bassistance.de/jquery-plugins/jquery-plugin-validation/
>
> Oh it's great.
>
> I wonder though if your choice of writing class="{x:y;z:t}" is not
try to using it with ie6
the sources are worng
i think you have zipped the version that is not working with ie6.
its writes "$.vaildiator is not an object"
Jörn Zaefferer wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> just released beta 1 of my validation plugin. The list of problem was
> reduced quite a lot, a
> http://bassistance.de/jquery-plugins/jquery-plugin-validation/
Oh it's great.
I wonder though if your choice of writing class="{x:y;z:t}" is not
potentially problematic.
As I see it:
- it could be incompatible with CSS2.1 selectors
- it is probably incompatible with jQuery selectors
- it is *c
Hi,
testing demoform "validating a complete from"
i entered 123456 in password field, then entered 11 in confirm password
which leads to a warning "please enter the same password as above" which is
correct.
now i enter 11 in password field. so both inputs match each other. but the
warni
Hi folks,
just released beta 1 of my validation plugin. The list of problem was
reduced quite a lot, and currently I have no more outstanding feature
requests.
Most notable new features:
- dependency checking: The required method accepts both
jQuery-expressions and functions to compute whethe
15 matches
Mail list logo
