Robert, I have a similar 3-way diagram, with "Control" being the
primary focus of IxD, "Comprehension" being the primary focus of
Information Design and "Connectedness" being the primary focus of
IA.
http://mauvyrusset.com/2008/09/26/the-foci-of-user-experience/
- Richard
. . . . . . . . . . .
My sister won't eat the blue ones. It's her way of protesting them
since they weren't originally there when she was a kid.
On Mar 31, 2009, at 9:28 PM, Jared Spool wrote:
I don't know which one is better, but I'm pretty sure that Blue has
no real reason to exist.
Cheers!
Todd Zaki Warfel
On Mar 31, 2009, at 11:38 AM, Todd Zaki Warfel wrote:
This is like watching a bunch of kindergartners argue over which M&M
is better.
I don't know which one is better, but I'm pretty sure that Blue has no
real reason to exist.
Jared
___
> So, why are we arguing over 0.001%?
I have no clue. But another thing:
I have thought about what Dave said some days ago in this
(multiple thread) discussion, that I wanted to start a
marketing campaign for UX.
It was not the main reason, but re-thinking the issue in
marketing terms makes se
The Introduction to About Face 3 contains a very simple venn diagram that I
first described here on this list:
I like to think of User Experience Design as a 3-circle Venn diagram,
where the circles represent Form, Behavior, and Content design. The
circles each intersect with each other. IxD occ
On Mar 31, 2009, at 2:38 PM, Todd Zaki Warfel wrote:
Incidentally, whether intentional or not, the appearance here is
that IxD is trying to become the "dominant" field in UX and not
acknowledge that the IA field can or has evolved.
Just to be clear, I'm not attempting to state that Dan is
So, once again, I'll propose all this bickering about the difference
of IA/IxD, or why people aren't UX Designers, but are IAs or IxDs is
an argument for 0.001%. The case where any of us are working on a
system that won't have both IA and IxD is statistically non-existent.
So, why are we ar
