Been to http://focussuites.com/ a number of times.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Posted from the new ixda.org
http://www.ixda.org/discuss?post=42308
Welcome to the Interaction Design Associati
I've had good luck with:
http://www.murrayhillcenter.com/about.html
Not a great site, but they did good recruiting and have good facilities.
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ... disc...@
The STC Usability and User Experience Special Interest Group maintains a
listing of labs in New York and elsewhere.
http://www.stcsig.org/usability/topics/recruiting-firms.html
Best
Caroline Jarrett
www.formsthatwork.com
Welcome t
These guys are more aligned with Market research but I have heard
people who have used the more for usability type testing.
The Focus Room, http://www.focusroom.com/
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Posted from the new ixda.org
http://www.ixda.org/discuss?post=4
I have worked with New York Focus on a number of occassions and have
had great results - http://www.newyorkfocus.com/new_york/home.htm.
I have also worked with Schlesinger Associates to a lesser extent as
well
-http://www.schlesingerassociates.com/locations/newyork_home.html.
Both facilities can
We used Murray Hill Center in NYC a few years ago for paper prototype
tests and were pleased with their recruiting, facilities and service
overall.
http://www.murrayhillcenter.com/nyc/nyc_facility.html
Tania
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Posted from the new
Hi Nicholas,
What are your requirements? Do you need a special area for
observers, with a one-way mirror, etc., or do you just need space for
equipment, moderator and subject?
If the latter, you could try New Work City. They have a conference
room that would probably work. Otherwise you could
Looking for recommendations on a place anyone has used in Manhattan
for doing usability tests. I saw this question in the archive,
(http://www.ixda.org/discuss.php?post=28337) but it had no replies.
Thanks.
Welcome to the Interaction