Re: [IxDA Discuss] IA Wiki 2.0? (was Prototypical)

2007-11-13 Thread dave malouf
What do people think about this resource? http://www.interaction-design.org/ I know that UXNet tried to start a relationship with this initiative awhile ago, but I never saw anything come of it. Despite the title of interaction-design is it really "interaction design" or is it just UX? -- dave

Re: [IxDA Discuss] IA Wiki 2.0? (was Prototypical)

2007-11-13 Thread Christian Crumlish
The host/owner of IA wiki became unable to maintain it. The IA Institute offered to take it over and it's part of our larger "IA resources initiative" to relaunch it, along with IA slash and our own library and tools collections. We'll keep you posted on our progress over here, but in the meantime

Re: [IxDA Discuss] IA Wiki 2.0? (was Prototypical)

2007-11-13 Thread Eric Scheid
On 14/11/07 3:17 AM, "Bryan Minihan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why not identify Wikipedia entries that are lacking, and contribute to those > as a community? That way, there's no need to build/manage a separate Wiki, > and the IxDA.org site can just list those entries they feel need > updating

Re: [IxDA Discuss] IA Wiki 2.0? (was Prototypical)

2007-11-13 Thread Eric Scheid
On 14/11/07 2:53 AM, "Christopher Fahey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I also think this is a great idea. Wasn't there already an IA Wiki? > Seems to be dead now. > http://www.iawiki.org/ Comatose, not dead - the server blew up. I'm relocating it to a new service, and taking the opportunity to ex

Re: [IxDA Discuss] IA Wiki 2.0? (was Prototypical)

2007-11-13 Thread Dan Saffer
On Nov 13, 2007, at 8:17 AM, Bryan Minihan wrote: > Why not identify Wikipedia entries that are lacking, and contribute > to those > as a community? The basic "interaction design" entry (english) is atrocious. Let's start there. Dan _

Re: [IxDA Discuss] IA Wiki 2.0? (was Prototypical)

2007-11-13 Thread Adrian Howard
On 13 Nov 2007, at 16:38, Robert Barlow-Busch wrote: >> Seeing as I never used it, either, there must have been something >> wrong with it. What was it? > > Well, one problem was technical. A few times in the past year, I've > tried to > add or edit content, only to get an error. If I'm remembe

Re: [IxDA Discuss] IA Wiki 2.0? (was Prototypical)

2007-11-13 Thread Robert Barlow-Busch
> Seeing as I never used it, either, there must have been something > wrong with it. What was it? Well, one problem was technical. A few times in the past year, I've tried to add or edit content, only to get an error. If I'm remembering correctly, the error was something along the lines of "out of

Re: [IxDA Discuss] IA Wiki 2.0? (was Prototypical)

2007-11-13 Thread Bryan Minihan
ember 13, 2007 10:54 AM To: IxDA Discuss Subject: [IxDA Discuss] IA Wiki 2.0? (was Prototypical) > what I would rather see is a live document (e.g. a Wiki) ... I also think this is a great idea. Wasn't there already an IA Wiki? Seems to be dead now. http://www.iawiki.org/ Seeing as I

[IxDA Discuss] IA Wiki 2.0? (was Prototypical)

2007-11-13 Thread Christopher Fahey
> what I would rather see is a live document (e.g. a Wiki) ... I also think this is a great idea. Wasn't there already an IA Wiki? Seems to be dead now. http://www.iawiki.org/ Seeing as I never used it, either, there must have been something wrong with it. What was it? Too little promotion