If anyone is ever interested in paying me to write up the history of
the founding of IxDA, I'd be more than happy to. 8-)
The short answer is that we have always said we would be "memberless"
b/c we didn't want to compete. This choice probably with a few other
environmental factors drove a lot of
Hi folks,
I wanted to add for the historical record that the IxD Discussion
list wasn't just born in 2005. It was born in mid-2003 as a Yahoo!
Groups list and migrated later that year to
www.interactiondesigners.com. Over the next two years, it became
known as the "Interaction Design Group" and gr
Good just be good list design, and any of the disciplines could have had a
lively community if they had meshed openess with structure the way IxDA has.
Love ot see a case study on the design choices that went into this list.
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 5:38 AM, David Malouf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think another key attribute that Josh didn't discuss is that the
discipline of interaction design is different from how those with the
job title may be practicing it.
Putting that broad statement to the side for a minute the way I think
of it historically and within practice is that ...
1) SIGCH
Hi Mary,
Thanks for your questions. I've actually just returned from
Vancouver where the IxDA Board of Directors was meeting to plan our
next conference (Interaction '09!) and to reaffirm our
organizational mission. So your questions come at a good time.
Your question seems to be asking both abou
have the discussion lists I have followed for years - SIGCHI and STC
Usability - been abandoned in favor of IxDA? I have all my professional
discussions filtered into one folder, to read when I have time, and notice a
dramatic drop in postings from the two I mention. The names of those who
post
