There are a number of books and articles on formal walkthroughs and
inspections that might be relevant. The books have detailed procedures for
planning, conducting, and analyzing the output of these sessions.
Chauncey
Freedman, D. P., Weinberg, G. W. (1990). Handbook of walkthroughs,
I'm not sure if this is exactly what you want but Scott Berkun's
article reminded me of this one.
http://www.uie.com/articles/critique/
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Posted from the new ixda.org
http://www.ixda.org/discuss?post=36940
Subject: Re: [IxDA Discuss] Peer Review in User Experience Design
I'm not sure if this is exactly what you want but Scott Berkun's article
reminded me of this one.
http://www.uie.com/articles/critique/
Welcome to the Interaction
Precisely.
I do a lot of reading and in the books it is always nicely put ideal
situations and how things play out. I've also been to my fair share of
meetings and been excluded from my fair share as well. If the
meetings/critiques are not retaining the integrity of the goals and
objectives they
Hiya,
Peer review is undoubtly critical for unbiased design delivery and quality
output from any group.
Most design groups work in a collaborative environment. Its a brilliant idea
to not only involve
peers in design reviews but also design conception. A standard guideline is
to ensure that no
Anyone have a set of guidelines or suggested best practices with peer review
in UXD?
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ... disc...@ixda.org
Unsubscribe
Just to clarify - do you mean review of the performance of your peers
(yearly performance appraisal for example) or specific reviews of their
project work (a design review of conceptual prototype for example where the
focus is the deliverable, not the person)?.
Chauncey
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at
