Re: [IxDA Discuss] Traditional user testing vs micro design evolution (was: The death of web usability testing as we know it?)

2008-01-03 Thread Nick Iozzo
Thanks for the info to simulated Annealing; first I heard of it. But my concern is the cost in building production quality trial balloons. I feel that it will be cheaper to use traditional usability testing techniques when you explore the design space early on in the process. Once you feel you

Re: [IxDA Discuss] Traditional user testing vs micro design evolution (was: The death of web usability testing as we know it?)

2008-01-03 Thread Barbara Ballard
I actually took a swing at this (genetic algorithms to do control panel layout) for my aborted dissertation. I chose control panel layout because it was a limited design domain: knobs, dials, and so forth, that couldn't particularly morph. The problems I ran into were: 1. representing the

[IxDA Discuss] Traditional user testing vs micro design evolution (was: The death of web usability testing as we know it?)

2008-01-02 Thread Nick Iozzo
A great discussion appears to be happening under the original topic. I wanted to further focus it into something I have been thinking a lot about recently. So I have hijacked it and created this new thread. My apologies to Oleh. I find all of the applications coming out to do quick real time

Re: [IxDA Discuss] Traditional user testing vs micro design evolution (was: The death of web usability testing as we know it?)

2008-01-02 Thread Bruce Esrig
I'll take a chance that the following thought hasn't already been expressed on these threads. A lot of work has been done in somewhat-numerical realms to avoid getting stuck in local maxima. For example, you could throw a whole bunch of trial balloons into a room with a bumpy ceiling, see