hi Tyler, all,
I recall last year the Board nominations + accompanying text were posted to
the main discuss list, not just to the CRO figure . That seemed to spur
people on to think about who they might want to see on the board.
http://wiki.osgeo.org/index.php/Board_Election_2007#Nominations now
Hi all,
Last week I attended the Open Geospatial Consortium Technical
Committee (OGC-TC) meeting in Paris.
For those not to familiar with this meeting, it consists of a series
of Working Group (WG) meetings that mostly run around the development
of specifications (or standards if you
Also remember that OGC has made its Mass Market Working Group
discussion list public:
http://mail.opengeospatial.org/mailman/listinfo/mass-market-geo
This is the best way for non-members to get in on certain
discussions, particularly the ones Jeroen mentions. That allows
individuals to put
Thanks for the update Jeroen - going to add one more to your list...
Jeroen Ticheler wrote:
With this email I would like to touch upon two issues that I think are
relevant to OSGEO. I hope bringing this up can trigger some discussion
on how OSGEO would best benefit from the OGC spec
One of your developers has been very active, contributed lots of code,
advice, documentation but then their priorities change. They haven't got
as much time for the project, or maybe the project grows and they can't
keep up with increased email traffic.
The developer still holds a lot of
