Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] scale of FOSS projects

2008-05-08 Thread Mateusz Loskot
Howard Butler wrote: On May 6, 2008, at 3:10 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In the past i've heard it suggested that really successful open source projects now need serious organisational backing. They can't be built by a network of partly-funded enthusiast contributors alone. I think really s

[OSGeo-Discuss] GeoWeb student contest - closing soon!

2008-05-08 Thread Michael P. Gerlek
As part of the GeoWeb 2008 conference, a Student Contest is being held -- with significant cash prizes! Deadline is next week, so get your entry in soon. http://geowebconference.org/students-academia/contest-information (OSGeo is a happy little cosponsor of this event, as Open Source is a requ

[OSGeo-Discuss] Calendar at USGS CLICK

2008-05-08 Thread Mateusz Loskot
Folks, USGS runs a website for LiDAR geospatial technologies (CLICK), with an active bulletin board and calendar of geospatial events around the world. I found there a lot of various GIS events submitted Perhaps it's an interesting place to spread some of FOSS GIS events too we are involved an

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] scale of FOSS projects

2008-05-08 Thread Schuyler Erle
On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 12:03 +0200, Mateusz Loskot wrote: > Yes it does. Karl Fogel describes it very well in his book > (http://producingoss.com). I strongly recommend it to project leaders > and developers who maintain just-opened and want to get dirty with > principles of the FOSS world. One im

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] scale of FOSS projects

2008-05-08 Thread Mateusz Loskot
Schuyler Erle wrote: On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 12:03 +0200, Mateusz Loskot wrote: Yes it does. Karl Fogel describes it very well in his book (http://producingoss.com). I strongly recommend it to project leaders and developers who maintain just-opened and want to get dirty with principles of the FOS

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] scale of FOSS projects

2008-05-08 Thread P Kishor
On 5/8/08, Schuyler Erle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 12:03 +0200, Mateusz Loskot wrote: > > > Yes it does. Karl Fogel describes it very well in his book > > (http://producingoss.com). I strongly recommend it to project leaders > > and developers who maintain just-opened an

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] scale of FOSS projects

2008-05-08 Thread Miles Fidelman
P Kishor wrote: On 5/8/08, Schuyler Erle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: One important point that Fogel makes that I think is worth noting here is that the number-one sine-qua-non of *any* potentially successful software project is *shipping working code*. Until a developer does that, the discuss

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] scale of FOSS projects

2008-05-08 Thread Paul Ramsey
On May 8, 2008, at 3:32 PM, Miles Fidelman wrote: With rare exception (there are geniuses among us), it's pretty hard for one person to accomplish all that much, in a short amount of time, in odd hours outside their day job. At least none of the interesting projects I've been involved with

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] scale of FOSS projects

2008-05-08 Thread Paulo Marcondes
> > Linus didn't write all of Linux. But he wrote enough for it to be useful. > > Too much philosophy, not enough code. :) As Linus puts it: "talk is cheap..." =] -- Paulo Marcondes = PU1/PU2PIX -22.915 -42.224 = GG86jc ___ Discuss mailing list Disc

RE: [OSGeo-Discuss] scale of FOSS projects

2008-05-08 Thread Michael P. Gerlek
Or, to quote the IETF, "rough consensus and running code". -mpg > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paulo Marcondes > Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 4:20 PM > To: OSGeo Discussions > Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] scale of FOSS projects

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] scale of FOSS projects

2008-05-08 Thread Miles Fidelman
Michael P. Gerlek wrote: Or, to quote the IETF, "rough consensus and running code". Except that the reference is to the informal criteria for when one might even beginning to firm up a standard. In the IETF community - unlike pretty much every other standards body on the planet - there's a

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] scale of FOSS projects

2008-05-08 Thread Tim Bowden
On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 21:28 -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote: > Michael P. Gerlek wrote: > > Or, to quote the IETF, "rough consensus and running code". > > > Except that the reference is to the informal criteria for when one might > even beginning to firm up a standard. In the IETF community - unl