Dave,
So maybe we should have 1-5 stars (or osgeo logos) which is quickly
visually understood by our target audience, and that is followed by a
word or two describing each star rating.
5 logos (not used yet)
4 logos (very mature - passed osgeo incubation)
3 logos (mature - started or ready to
On 11/06/10 01:59, Michael P. Gerlek wrote:
(Along those lines, I'd also ask precisely what ready to start incubation
means...)
Ready to start incubation implies that projects that have applied for,
or are mature enough to apply, can be ranked at the same level as
projects in incubation.
will osgeo have a presence at the Canadian hydrographic conference in
Quebec City starting June 19?
On Jun 9, 2010, at 7:10 PM, Daniel Morissette wrote:
Hi Everyone,
It is with great pleasure that I remind you all that the Rendez-vous
OSGeo-Québec (http://rendez-vous-osgeo-qc.org/2010/)
that projects that have applied for
Good...
or are mature enough to apply
...But does mature enough mean Criteria 1-3 are met, or that some of the
Desirables are met too, or..?
-mpg
From: discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org [mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org]
On Behalf Of Cameron
Your comments on specific logos for specific items is good; and amounts to a
very light feature comparison.
GeoTools ran into the limits of our own 5 star system; we ended up needing a
different set of stars depending on the the kind of module being described.
The limit was when we entered the
