Hello list,
my last mail was not supposed to go on the list. Sorry.
Do me a favor - IGNORE IT.
Thanks
Astrid
Am 09.02.2012 08:09, schrieb Astrid Emde:
HAllo Arnulf,
danke für die Mail.
On Wed, February 8, 2012 8:47 pm, Arnulf Christl wrote:
Folks,
this thread is growing way too big i
HAllo Arnulf,
danke für die Mail. Sie hat sicherlich viel der Verwirrung gelöst. Für
Leute, die nicht wissen, dass es Jeff nicht gut geht, kam der Rücktritt
sicherlich überraschend. Verwundert hat mich nur, dass ihr als Board als
die Bösen dargestellt wurdet. Ihr seid doch alle so nett und sensibe
Hi Arnulf,
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Arnulf Christl wrote:
> Folks,
> this thread is growing way too big in my opinion. If you want to know
> why Jeff resigned, please ask him.
ich weiss nicht: Man liest die private Mail von him ans Board und es
wird offensichtlich, dass er sich schlecht b
Folks,
this thread is growing way too big in my opinion. If you want to know
why Jeff resigned, please ask him.
I am not going to thank and farewell him because I don't think that he
is leaving and I want to leave a door open for him to just continue
doing what he is good at. This is not an employ
Mike,
thanks for this, it pretty much echoes my feelings, especially further
down when you say:
On 02/08/2012 07:57 AM, Smith, Michael ERDC-CRREL-NH wrote:
> This really comes out best as expressing my feelings toward Jeff as well.
> I consider him not only one of OSGeo's biggest assets ;), but al
This really comes out best as expressing my feelings toward Jeff as well.
I consider him not only one of OSGeo's biggest assets ;), but also one of
its most passionate advocates. I worked with Jeff closely on the annual
benchmarking efforts, some conference organizing, some workshops, as well
as on
Jeff,
I want to thank you for all your service on the board and on committees.
OSGeo would not be what it is today without all your efforts. I have a
huge respect for all you have done for OSGeo and Mapserver where I am
closer to your efforts and on other projects that you have selflessly
jum
Hi,
WFS 1.1.0 is indeed not saying anything on the order of axis explicitly.
And I think you can't find anything on axis order in WFS 1.1.0, since
axis order is defined in the CRS definition (not by WFS). So I'd say it
is the other way around: why /not/ respect axis order? There is nothing
in
On 2012/02/06 7:06 AM, Jeff McKenna wrote:
(on the [OSGeo-Conf] list)
Hello everyone,
I haven't been able to give my usual effort to this conference
committee, since Denver. I feel it is best that I resign and let
everyone continue their great FOSS4G work.
[snip]
And to all of the past FOSS4
Hi Board,
pl do discuss this in the OSGeo Discuss list. I feel sorry to loose Jeff (from
the board) who has showcased OSGeo in non-english speaking China, Vietnam and
many more.
Is there any connection with FOSS4G 2012.
Remember his talk at Cape Town, and the thunderous applause received.
Ravi
Hi,
please, can anybody point me to the document and page, where it is
written, that WFS 1.1.0 should respect axis order of the coordinate
reference system? I really tried to find this out - no success.
Thanks
Jachym
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_
11 matches
Mail list logo
