37 or 30 is what is going to decide .. election or NO election. It is a close
call.
Would be happy to see all 37 on board. Those at the helm may pl give it a
thought.
Ravi
________________________________
From: Venkatesh Raghavan <ragha...@media.osaka-cu.ac.jp>
To: bo...@lists.osgeo.org
Cc: OSGeo Discussions <discuss@lists.osgeo.org>
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 6:15 PM
Subject: [Board] Accept all 35 Charter Member Nomination for 2013 electiona.
Arnulf,
Many thanks for managing the Charter Member 2013 elections.
I motion to accept all 37 nominees into Charter
Membership and override the decision taken in the last board
meeting.
On 2013/07/24 17:58, Seven (aka Arnulf) wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> All,
> this is a minor correction, we actually have 37 potential new members!
+1 for electing all 37 new Charter Members.
> As per board motion from 2013-07-11 [1] we limit the influx of new
> member to 30. This (arbitrary) decision was taken because 30 is a
> nice compromise between 10% and one third of the number of the
> existing membership (14 and 48 new members) which are the limits as
> per our bylaws.
+1 to revise the above "arbitrary" decision. Voting would have made sense
if we have more than 48 nominations for new Charter Members.
> I propose to not have a (s)election and accept all nominees into
> Charter membership.
++1
Best
Venka
> I can see no reason that would justify
> excluding anybody from this great list of nominees and we are still
> well in scope of our bylaws. If you firmly believe that an election
> is crucial to our mission and goal I will duly follow your advice
> and start the elections tomorrow (2013-07-25). I am sorry that this
> is a very short notice to change something so important.
>
> I suggest that one of you starts a motion stating something along
> the lines of: "I motion to accept all 35 nominees into Charter
> Membership and override the decision taken in the last board
> meeting."
>
>
> Ideally we will be able to get +1 votes from all board members
> asap. In case of strong objection please answer with a veto (-1)
> immediately in which case I will take a deep breath, sigh and
> continue with the elections.
>
>
> Best regards, Arnulf
>
> _______________________________________________ Board mailing list
> bo...@lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board
>
> - --
> Exploring Space, Time and Mind
> http://arnulf.us
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAlHvlz0ACgkQXmFKW+BJ1b2LaQCcCRNNXFDvU+iz4wW8yyWSaI3h
> Mw8An3IP/30k5jdIYZA3WifmoqT069x6
> =JqF+
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> Board mailing list
> bo...@lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board
>
>
_______________________________________________
Board mailing list
bo...@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
