Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] RE : Re: OSGEO4W future

2013-09-21 Thread Mateusz Loskot
On 21 September 2013 23:35, Tamas Szekeres wrote: > > And so on (anyone is welcomed to add further experiences or ideas) I think it may be worth to remind about CoApp: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/osgeo4w-dev/2013-April/002168.html Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.losko

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] RE : Re: OSGEO4W future

2013-09-21 Thread Tamas Szekeres
Gerald, There are so many decisions that should be made regarding to either the suggested directions to follow, or the technical details, which might apply for a PSC indeed. You've meant to prepare something for the developers (something like what I've indended to do with the binaries at http://w

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] OSGEO4W future

2013-09-21 Thread Jo Cook
Just a quick email to say that I wholeheartedly agree with all the ideas here, and I want to be involved. I'm not sure how much I can help with right now as, post FOSS4G, I really want some time away from committees and organising :-) Jo ___ Discuss mail

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] RE : Re: OSGEO4W future

2013-09-21 Thread Fenoy Gerald
Alex, thanks a lot for such kind of answer. In fact what I have in mind is more to provide a "build suite", I definitely don't know how to name it. Anyway, let say something that make you able to download this or that software and which will make sure that you will get everything required to b