Dear All,
I will try to summarize the discussion points and proposed actions. (Please
correct me, add points or actions i didn't see.)
For all of the point I think we need a clear proposal for change with
motivation, or at least a description of the issues, otherwise we go on
discussing each one w
Am I the only person who finds it difficult to follow a thread in a mailing
list where postings get repeated continuously as the thread is replied to (let
alone our tendency to post across several lists - mea culpa)?
Dare I suggest that we seek a simpler and clearer forum for this discussion?
I
Hello all,
I saw this interesting post here on OSGeo & GIS Day in 2012:
http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/2012-November/011158.html
I am currently in Africa for one month and someone here is organising an
annual GIS Day in November. He wanted to do a formal OSGeo day with
training session,
Hi all,
Just a reminder that OSGeo is on Google+, and what seems to be happening
is that this page has become a great way for community members to share
their news (links to articles, applications,...). I noticed today that
we're at ~600 members.
http://plus.google.com/communities/105969056
Ok, first draft of wiki page is here:
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Conference_Options_2014
Please feel free to improve the text, or insert your comments / votes.
On 19/09/2014 6:14 pm, Steven Feldman wrote:
Am I the only person who finds it difficult to follow a thread in a
mailing list where pos
Hi Robert,
Thank you for those references.
As a Metropolitan Transport Authority we need to create macro public transport
models to simulate, analyse and plan the transport network and services
provided to the city population.
PTV and other providers, offer very efficient software tools to help o
Last week's OSGeo Booth at FOSS4G Portland was a huge success. But not
without the hard work of people that really need a special thank you, a
special huge pat on the back:
- Eli Adam[1]: Eli provided a lot of the materials, and helped setup
laptops/demos etc. A member of the kick-ass boots-
Again from the sidelines... It would be an interesting exercise to
conceptualize how having a single professional conference organizing
company would have/have not made a difference with the failed voyage of
FOSS4G to China in 2012. - Dan
***
Thanks Cameron, this really helps!
I made a small adjustment so that all suggested option now have there
advantages listed first, followed by their disadvantages. Makes it a bit
more neutral.
Personally I would leave out the "voting" sections in this stage (comments
are OK). Just listing th
China would still have failed, but we would have known about it [and,
hopefully, acted] sooner.
-mpg
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Dan Ames wrote:
> Again from the sidelines... It would be an interesting exercise to
> conceptualize how having a single professional conference organizing
> c
Dan,
You might want to look over the lessons learned from 2012.
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS4G_2012_Lessons_Learned
I respectfully disagree with Michael. I think that early support of the
China FOSS4G could have steered the event to be a successful, although
smaller event.
On 20/09/2014 5:
Dan,
You might want to look over the lessons learned from 2012.
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS4G_2012_Lessons_Learned
I respectfully disagree with Michael. I think that early support of the
China FOSS4G could have steered the event to be a successful, although
smaller event.
On 20/09/2014 5:
It was an amazing booth, some more photos:
- https://flic.kr/p/oZLwY6
- https://flic.kr/p/phgKit
Jody Garnett
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Jeff McKenna <
jmcke...@gatewaygeomatics.com> wrote:
> Last week's OSGeo Booth at FOSS4G Portland was a huge success. But not
> without the hard work
13 matches
Mail list logo
