+1
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Eli Adam ea...@co.lincoln.or.us wrote:
Vasile,
Great work pulling this together.
We keep calling this discussion things like Charter member elections
and addressing it during election periods. I think that topic is
really something else, the nature
Hi Maxi and Eli,
I like Maxi's clarification of charter member involvement. I see
similarities with:
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Board_of_Directors#Suggested_involvement_from_board_members
(I found this list, originally started by Arnulf, to be very useful when
I was considering involvement
Thanks Eli,
I agree with you about the distinction between Participants and Members.
While participants are those that are working with open source technologies
in the geospatial field (I know many people that don't care of OSGeo but
follow many list of open source projects or topics because this
Dear All,
don't forget about the moral task of Charter members, to be an advocate of
OSGeo and FOSS4G.
I would keep OSGeo membership, those who are not contributing code,
documentation, etc. to a project, membership is the only way to express their
connection to OSGeo.
It is more than just
Vasile,
Great work pulling this together.
We keep calling this discussion things like Charter member elections
and addressing it during election periods. I think that topic is
really something else, the nature and types of OSGeo Membership or
something similar.
If we evaluate our existing
