Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo is becoming irrelevant. Here's why. Let's fix it.

2015-10-01 Thread Bart van den Eijnden
Before going to this trouble, we should check if there is an actual demand among projects? Best regards, Bart > On 01 Oct 2015, at 13:17, Jeff McKenna wrote: > > On 2015-10-01 4:18 AM, Jachym Cepicky wrote: >> I'm using gitlab already and it really gives you

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo is becoming irrelevant. Here's why. Let's fix it.

2015-10-01 Thread Jeff McKenna
On 2015-10-01 4:18 AM, Jachym Cepicky wrote: I'm using gitlab already and it really gives you what I like on github Shall we ask the board and SAC for create instance of gitlab on our servers? J I think asking SAC about hosting GitLab on our servers is a great idea! A nice option for

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo is becoming irrelevant. Here's why. Let's fix it.

2015-10-01 Thread Mateusz Loskot
On 1 October 2015 at 13:20, Bart van den Eijnden wrote: > Before going to this trouble, we should check if there is an actual demand > among projects? Indeed. Besides, projects which have already adopted GitHub may not be willing to switch again. I actually doubt it. My

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo is becoming irrelevant. Here's why. Let's fix it.

2015-10-01 Thread Sandro Santilli
Given we already have trac, may I suggest to try at just improving it to allow for storing code in a git repository, wherever it is ? I understand there's a plugin to allow for that, did anyone try it ? Speaking about projects demand, here's a list of tickets about trac (many of which being

[OSGeo-Discuss] Second Call for Code of Conduct (CoC) Committee Members

2015-10-01 Thread Kristin Bott
*Second Call for Code of Conduct (CoC) Committee Members* The mission of the Code of Conduct (CoC) Committee is to assist in making sure that OSGeo continues to be an inclusive and welcoming organization; we will accomplish this by (1) guiding policy around the CoC

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo is becoming irrelevant. Here's why. Let's fix it.

2015-10-01 Thread Jachym Cepicky
I'm using gitlab already and it really gives you what I like on github Shall we ask the board and SAC for create instance of gitlab on our servers? J st 30. 9. 2015 v 14:31 odesílatel Mateusz Loskot napsal: > On 30 September 2015 at 07:20, Paolo Cavallini

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Election 2015] Board of Directors elections results

2015-10-01 Thread Ravi Kumar
Congrats to the new board entrants, Ravi Kumar On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Vasile Craciunescu wrote: > Dear all, > > Theses are the final results from the 2015 elections[1] for the open > seats[2] of the OSGeo Board of Directors. There were *five* seats open > and

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Election 2015] Board of Directors elections results

2015-10-01 Thread Jachym Cepicky
Big kudos to Vasile - thanks J čt 1. 10. 2015 v 9:09 odesílatel Ravi Kumar napsal: > Congrats to the new board entrants, > Ravi Kumar > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Vasile Craciunescu < > vas...@geo-spatial.org> wrote: > >> Dear all, >> >> Theses are the

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo is becoming irrelevant. Here's why. Let's fix it.

2015-10-01 Thread Jachym Cepicky
As you write. GitLab is alternative to new projects, which are condiering GitHub. And to old projects still using Trac (IMHO) J čt 1. 10. 2015 v 13:37 odesílatel Jeff McKenna < jmcke...@gatewaygeomatics.com> napsal: > I think it would be a great option for new/incubating projects. However > it

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Election 2015] Board of Directors elections results

2015-10-01 Thread Sanghee Shin
Dear All, Most of all I really appreciate Vasile’s great work for the election. Wow, what a turnout number is! I also would like to thank to outgoing board members for their contributions and directions. I feel honoured to be a director and look forward to working with all of you for the