Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Opticks Website Down?

2016-03-08 Thread Norman Vine
On Mar 8, 2016, at 5:20 PM, Regie Alam wrote: > That happened to me too. > > Regie > Same here I have emailed the optics dev list of this Hopefully someone will get back to me > On Mar 8, 2016 4:12 PM, "Jeff Ruby" wrote: > Does anyone know what's up with the Opticks website? I want to d

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Opticks Website Down?

2016-03-08 Thread Regie Alam
That happened to me too. Regie On Mar 8, 2016 4:12 PM, "Jeff Ruby" wrote: > Does anyone know what's up with the Opticks website? I want to download > the latest version but opticks.org redirects to some zulip/notcows.com site. > It's been this way for awhile. > > Thanks much, > -Jeff > > __

[OSGeo-Discuss] Opticks Website Down?

2016-03-08 Thread Jeff Ruby
Does anyone know what's up with the Opticks website? I want to download the latest version but opticks.org redirects to some zulip/notcows.com site. It's been this way for awhile. Thanks much, -Jeff ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http:

[OSGeo-Discuss] Buildbot resurrection, again (was: how did the Paris code sprint go)

2016-03-08 Thread Mateusz Loskot
On 8 March 2016 at 19:42, Sandro Santilli wrote: > On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 03:32:54PM +, Jody Garnett wrote: >> I second the idea of build boxes being very important to the well being of >> projects. I was not aware that OSGeo had been running one, or that it had >> been taken away. > > It was

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] how did the Paris code sprint go

2016-03-08 Thread Sandro Santilli
On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 03:32:54PM +, Jody Garnett wrote: > I second the idea of build boxes being very important to the well being of > projects. I was not aware that OSGeo had been running one, or that it had > been taken away. It was set up by Mateusz, did run wonderfully and got later disc

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] how did the Paris code sprint go

2016-03-08 Thread Even Rouault
Jonathan, if you feel OSGeo should have an environmental policy, you could certainly propose one for consideration by the larger community, and then volunteer to champion to make it adopted, and enforce it afterwards. Even > > > On Tue, 08 Mar 2016 15:01:19 + Daniel > Morissette

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] how did the Paris code sprint go

2016-03-08 Thread Jonathan Moules
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/strawman On Tue, 08 Mar 2016 15:01:19 + Daniel Morissette wrote On 2016-03-08 8:37 AM, Jonathan Moules wrote: > > Looking at the participant list, that Paris code-sprint entailed at > least 10 transatlantic flights and pr

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] how did the Paris code sprint go

2016-03-08 Thread Jody Garnett
I second the idea of build boxes being very important to the well being of projects. I was not aware that OSGeo had been running one, or that it had been taken away. I assume you have looked at solutions like Travis which are "free" to open source (in exchange for the advertising they get by being

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] how did the Paris code sprint go

2016-03-08 Thread Mateusz Loskot
On 8 March 2016 at 12:19, Oliver Courtin wrote: > Le 8 mars 2016 à 09:34, Sandro Santilli a écrit : >> >> Donating some fun to core developers is surely appreciated [..] >> but is just to stress out that it doesn't >> take being in the same room at the same time to move a project forward. > > Obvi

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] how did the Paris code sprint go

2016-03-08 Thread Daniel Morissette
On 2016-03-08 8:37 AM, Jonathan Moules wrote: Looking at the participant list, that Paris code-sprint entailed at least 10 transatlantic flights and probably at least that many short-haul (pan-Europe) flights too (which have higher emissions profiles per passenger mile). I don't doubt a lot of u

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] how did the Paris code sprint go

2016-03-08 Thread Jonathan Moules
Hi Oliver, I can certainly see how meeting would help communities; as you say, that's how humans work. But what about the even bigger (global) community? Looking at the participant list, that Paris code-sprint entailed at least 10 transatlantic flights and probably at least that many short-haul

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] how did the Paris code sprint go

2016-03-08 Thread Oliver Courtin
Le 8 mars 2016 à 09:34, Sandro Santilli a écrit : Sandro, > This is not to say that Paul work wasn't needed Thanks for him ^^ And he -also- did a great job, with leading several devs who never yet send code to PostGIS trunk (but really motivated to). Kind of thing that can't really be done

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] how did the Paris code sprint go

2016-03-08 Thread Sandro Santilli
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 07:03:31PM +, Hogan, Patrick (ARC-PX) wrote: > A truly exemplary individual effort for all sprinters, > for how great work well precedes the sprint itself, > allowing Paul to make the most of this coding event. It might be of interest that the bug which kept Paul bu

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] FDO Oracle driver

2016-03-08 Thread Paolo Cavallini
Il 08/03/2016 09:08, Johan Van de Wauw ha scritto: > All providers can be found in svn. > > Check kingoracle: > https://svn.osgeo.org/fdo/trunk/Providers/ Thanks Johan. All the best. -- Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html __

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] FDO Oracle driver

2016-03-08 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
All providers can be found in svn. Check kingoracle: https://svn.osgeo.org/fdo/trunk/Providers/ On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 8:49 AM, Paolo Cavallini wrote: > Il 08/03/2016 08:37, Paolo Cavallini ha scritto: >> Hi all, >> anyone knows the state of this? It seems an OSgeo project: >> https://fdo.osgeo.