Marc,
you can find the founding info on the OSGeo website.
http://www.osgeo.org/content/foundation//meetings/2006_02_04/meeting.html
specifically here is the list of founders and the projects
http://www.osgeo.org/content/foundation//meetings/2006_02_04/participants.html
the founding projects are
Marc,
Thank you for writing down your thoughts, I will re-read them during the
weekend and comment on them. It is a great starting point to forward
with OSGeo as a volunteer based organisation.
As an outreach opportunity, I would like to invite at least one of all
the OSGeo advocates from the pro
On 15 April 2016 at 14:51, Sandro Santilli wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 02:21:22PM +0200, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>
>> Finally, GitHub, wins: feature-wise, marketing-wise, with 'zero' maintenance
>> - most, if not all, of our projects already prefer GitHub.
>
> 1. marketing wasn't in your 10 poi
Hi Maxi
I have not been at the actual birthing myself ;-)
As far as I could retrieve from the archives the MapServer community appeared
to have been the basis, as its Bylaws were legally transferred/adopted. Perhaps
someone else knows more?
More importantly it illustrates that ; the mental mode
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 02:21:22PM +0200, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> On 15 April 2016 at 09:52, Sandro Santilli wrote:
> > What would you want from an OSGeo Git Service ?
>
> My 10 features are:
>
> 1. LDAP (log in with OSGeo User ID or OpenID)
> 2. Private repositories
> 3. Organizations (e.g./GDA
On 15 April 2016 at 09:52, Sandro Santilli wrote:
> What would you want from an OSGeo Git Service ?
My 10 features are:
1. LDAP (log in with OSGeo User ID or OpenID)
2. Private repositories
3. Organizations (e.g./GDAL)
4. User space (fork /GDAL/gdal into /mloskot/gdal, also private fork)
5. Issu
Thanks Mark for sharing your personal vision, as multi-decade experienced
person.
I believe that your points are helpful to inspire further discussion.
The only remark I wish to mention is that OSGeo is a community that has
always been an umbrella for projects (it never evolved to, but it born fro
As some of you already noted the message contains an invalid link.
Of course it should point to http://2016.foss4g.org
regards,
Gert-Jan
Van: Gert-Jan van der Weijden - Stichting OSGeo.nl
[mailto:gert-...@osgeo.nl]
Verzonden: vrijdag 15 april 2016 12:05
Aan: 'OSGeo Discussions'
On
Mark has started an excellent SWOT analysis of OSGeo, laying a
foundation for a practical, implementable vision for OSGeo. I suggest
everyone grad a coffee and take the time to read and then comment:
https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Talk:Marketing_Committee
Mark, thank you for the deep thought you h
Come in, we're open!
FOSS4G-2016 registration starts today
After several months of preparations, today is the day we happily open the
doors of FOSS4G 2016 Bonn, Germany! From the 24th to the 26th of August
hundreds (perhaps even one thousand!) users, developers, policy makers,
academics from all
All materials from Geotalleres are CC-BY-SA unless stated differently,
feel free to use them as you wish, a couple more resources about that
project:
- Website: http://geotalleres.github.io/geotalleres/
- Mailing list: https://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geotalleres-dev
Cheers
On 14
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 04:15:34PM +, Jody Garnett wrote:
> I think some kind of bridge to github is high on the list (viewing it more
> as an outreach marketing concern than anything). In my experience projects
> that are not officially on github get lots of unofficial forks - but that
> could
12 matches
Mail list logo