Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Digital Image Processing - Libraries and Programs

Hi Eduardo, Have you taken a look at GeoTrellis [1]? It's a Scala based library for doing many things geospatial, but with a focus on raster processing. It handles raster data generally, but is being used for projects to manipulate imagery, mainly by stitching together web map tiles out of large

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Digital Image Processing - Libraries and Programs

Eduardo, you are missing Whitebox Geospatial Analysis Tools (GAT): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitebox_Geospatial_Analysis_Tools Duarte ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Incubator] Should OSGeo accept "benevolent dictator" projects into OSGeo?

A PSC is not required for any OSGeo project (even a graduated project) - being inclusive is. The GeoNode project is an example in incubation that forms a leadership team based on recent committers as I understand it. The benevolent dictator model does not meet this inclusive requirement, Cameron

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Incubator] Should OSGeo accept "benevolent dictator" projects into OSGeo?

When acting in this capacity I speak as a member of OSGeo (and not as a boundless employee). There are several aspects about our foundation that I personally disagree with, never the less I try and respect the view point of each community I work with. Personally I do respect your opinion on the

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Incubator] Should OSGeo accept "benevolent dictator" projects into OSGeo?

On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Jody Garnett wrote: > This is kind of a larger topic than just the incubation committee, but no > I do not believe we should. It is a defining characteristic of our > foundation to not place many restrictions on our projects - but demand

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Incubator] Should OSGeo accept "benevolent dictator" projects into OSGeo?

Jody, Despite the infinite respect I have for your opinion and the Boundless organization, sincerely, I couldn’t more heartily disagree. At least I think I am disagreeing. Open source is open source, there are many flavors, each one serving different tastes, and each with different paths if

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Digital Image Processing - Libraries and Programs

You should look at OpenDroneMap too > On May 1, 2016, at 10:16 AM, Eduardo Pereira wrote: > > > Hello OSGeo community, > > > I'm currently part of team that is developing a free and open source program > with focus on fast classification of drones images. To achieve

[OSGeo-Discuss] Digital Image Processing - Libraries and Programs

Hello OSGeo community, I'm currently part of team that is developing a free and open source program with focus on fast classification of drones images. To achieve this we are going to use the objects and attributes from OBIA approach, Machine Learning and algorithms to auto tune the

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Incubator] Should OSGeo accept "benevolent dictator" projects into OSGeo?

This is kind of a larger topic than just the incubation committee, but no I do not believe we should. It is a defining characteristic of our foundation to not place many restrictions on our projects - but demand that the projects be inclusive and open to collaboration. I do not believe that the

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Incubator] Should OSGeo accept "benevolent dictator" projects into OSGeo?

OSGeo discuss, OSGeo incubation, OSGeo board, I'm hoping the greater OSGeo community will consider and comment on this question: Should OSGeo accept a "benevolent dictator" [1] governance model for incubating projects? -0 from me, Cameron Shorter. Background: * As part of incubation,