[OSGeo-Discuss] Problem Semi-Automatic Classification Plugin

2016-05-21 Thread Rodolfo Souza
Hi, I am trying to perform a imagery classification using Semi-Automatic Classification Plugin in QGis, but when I try to do the training part, my QGis shows the error message (please see below): Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/rodolfo/.qgis2/python/plugins/SemiAutomaticClassific

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Does rasdaman CE solve an open source geospatial problem?

2016-05-21 Thread dmcilhagga
Actually for some historical context here, the reason the rules around establishing PSC were established the way they are, was to ensure that Autodesk’s MapGuide project would not be dominated in the “Benevolent Dictator Model” that may otherwise have occurred. The PSC could not comprise more t

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Does rasdaman CE solve an open source geospatial problem?

2016-05-21 Thread Rob Emanuele
Peter, It's impressive that 20 TB is being served out by the community edition. However, the point that Edzer brings up (and that I was unaware of) causes me even more concern regarding the language used in service of promoting the potential OSGeo version of rasdaman around it's comparison to othe

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Does rasdaman CE solve an open source geospatial problem?

2016-05-21 Thread Dave McIlhagga
I think OSGeo should stay out of the business of weighing in on how companies decide to commercialize technologies, so long as they respect the licensing terms. We and many companies use MapServer for instance at the heart of our proprietary stacks, which is simply another flavor of the open co

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Does rasdaman CE solve an open source geospatial problem?

2016-05-21 Thread Andrea Aime
On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 2:36 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 2:06 PM, Cameron Shorter < > cameron.shor...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I'd be interested to hear opinions of others in the field as to whether >> Rasdaman community version is of value for real-world production systems by

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Does rasdaman CE solve an open source geospatial problem?

2016-05-21 Thread Andrea Aime
On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 2:06 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote: > I'd be interested to hear opinions of others in the field as to whether > Rasdaman community version is of value for real-world production systems by > itself. > I guess that would depend on the needs of the production system itself, and

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Does rasdaman CE solve an open source geospatial problem?

2016-05-21 Thread Cameron Shorter
Hi Edzer, Thank you for raising this topic questioning the value of radsaman community edition. It is pertinent considering recent discussions about Rasdaman incubation. Peter, your comments about programmers wanting to get paid for their work is valid, but does not provide justification for

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Mantra Request (OSgeoID)

2016-05-21 Thread Sandro Santilli
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 07:14:51PM +, Jason M Wheatley wrote: > I need a mantra so I can submit QGIS issues please! Thank you! For the record: Jason had already an account, I'm handling it with private communications. --strk; ___ Discuss mailing lis

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Does rasdaman CE solve an open source geospatial problem?

2016-05-21 Thread Peter Baumann
oh, just looking at the subject again: several service providers believe indeed rasdaman community does offer a significant advantage: - see the download figures on www.rasdaman.org - concretely, see www.planetserver.eu which is running rasdaman community on - I believe - about 20 TB of Planetary

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Incubator] Rasdaman has been in OSGeo Incubation for 4.5 years, not 6 years

2016-05-21 Thread Peter Baumann
the incubation ticket was filed on 2010-apr-05, trac calls this "6 years ago" [1]. We may or may not call this mark the start of the incubation process, but if we start breaking down to the details this shows that it took 1.5 years to respond to our initial request. -Peter [1] http://trac.osgeo.

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Does rasdaman CE solve an open source geospatial problem?

2016-05-21 Thread Peter Baumann
Hm, first of all: this is opening a different thread, talking about functionality of rasdaman community. Next, it is based on assumptions - without details (because off topic): conclusions are wrong. But to respond to the core message emphasized in the first paragraph: I respectfully disagree. In