In the Open vs Proprietary discussion, both have their features and detractors.
But, there is much more than the yin-yang of their details if we are to embrace
each for their contribution to ^our^ world and how they advance the quality of
life for all, not just a few.
Our society and the
It is important to note that the cost of licences in a solution (i.e. something
more than a simple desktop implementation) are only a part of the overall cost
and in many cases, in my experience, a small part.
Implementation, customisation, integration, training, ongoing support,
maintenance
On 25 March 2017 at 13:01, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
> Il 25/03/2017 12:56, Mateusz Loskot ha scritto:
>
>> They do, but at the same time, we wouldn't be where we are now
>> in terms of civilisation development. yin/yang
>
> Not quite sure about that: Mateusz, do you have a
I would also be interested. Have not read the entire thread yet. That said,
most (all?) large app and software providers now offer open APIs. Check out
Google, Twitter, Amazon and on and on. These APIs are "open" because anyone
can implement, use, develop, etc. You could even use the API
Dear colleagues,
This might be of interest to those working in AgriGIS. The Research Data
Alliance Interest Group on Agricultural Data (IGAD) Pre-Plenary meeting is
scheduled on 3-4 April 2017 in Barcelona. The two-day meeting, will include
presentations during the first day, related to the
Il 25/03/2017 12:56, Mateusz Loskot ha scritto:
> They do, but at the same time, we wouldn't be where we are now
> in terms of civilisation development. yin/yang
Not quite sure about that: Mateusz, do you have a reference to support this?
All the best, and thanks.
--
Paolo Cavallini -
On 25 March 2017 at 12:54, Sandro Santilli wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 12:43:29PM +0100, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>
>> without a secret, there is no technology advancement
>
> I think this is a purely ideological position.
>
> Secrets can generate all kind of deseases, if you ask
On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 12:43:29PM +0100, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> without a secret, there is no technology advancement
I think this is a purely ideological position.
Secrets can generate all kind of deseases, if you ask me :)
--strk;
___
Discuss
On 25 March 2017 at 10:17, Suchith Anand wrote:
> My query was if the term Open can be used for marketing any properitery
> softwares and platforms and to know if there are any guidelines on this?
Nobody has a monopoly on use of the word.
BTW, without a secret,
My query was if the term Open can be used for marketing any properitery
softwares and platforms and to know if there are any guidelines on this? This
definition Ravi Kumar send is helpful to help me understand one aspect of
this . Thanks Ravi Kumar.
Best wishes,
Suchith
I will try to join, but I'm available only after 16:30-16:45. Have a good
meeting!
Maria
Inviato dal mio dispositivo Samsung
Messaggio originale
Da: Suchith Anand
Data: 25/03/17 07:55 (GMT+01:00)
A: discuss@lists.osgeo.org,
And here is the biz model definition, I would be interested if the original
poster can clarify in which context the word was used :)
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 9:55 PM Ravi Kumar
wrote:
> This is a good thread, and let us discuss to derive a 'Note', for those
> facing
12 matches
Mail list logo