Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Geo4All] 2019 OSGeo UN Committee Educational Challenge

2019-05-19 Thread Cameron Shorter
Maria, Ivana, Oliva, Paulo, Serena, Obukov, This initiative you have announced looks great. The goals and timeframe align very closely with what we will be doing with OSGeo's involvement in Google Season of Docs [1]. It would be great if you could help shape our agenda by contributing to our

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] R: 2019 OSGeo UN Committee Educational Challenge

2019-05-19 Thread Jonathan Moules
Hi Maria, > People with more than 40 years can apply. Yes but they suffer a 20% penalty, that's a very significant penalty and is explicitly discriminatory against what is commonly considered a "protected attribute" (age), hence my raising the issue. > Moeover the scores will be

[OSGeo-Discuss] R: 2019 OSGeo UN Committee Educational Challenge

2019-05-19 Thread Maria Antonia Brovelli
Thanks for your comment. I have a different opinion. People with more than 40 years can apply. Moeover the scores will be compensated by their experience, as there are also scores for this: 1. Proposer’s documented experience in education and training: 20 (max) And I believe that, for a

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] 2019 OSGeo UN Committee Educational Challenge

2019-05-19 Thread Jonathan Moules
I've just taken a look at this and noticed this line as one of the evaluation criteria: > Proposer’s age (20 if <= 40 years old; 0 if >40 years old): 20 (max) When did explicit age discrimination (i.e. ageism) become acceptable? It seems to run counter to the OSGeo Goal of: "be a welcoming