Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Howard Butler receives the 2023 Sol Katz Award at FOSS4G 2023 Prizren, Kosovo

Congratulations Howard! Mateusz On Sat, 1 Jul 2023, 19:02 Astrid Emde (OSGeo) via Discuss, < discuss@lists.osgeo.org> wrote: > See News Item 2023-07-01 > > https://www.osgeo.org/foundation-news/howard-butler-receives-the-2023-sol-katz-award/ > > We are honoured to announce that Howard Butler is

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo would like to welcome our 15 new OSGeo Charter Members 2021

Congratulations to the new Charter Members! -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net On Mon, 13 Dec 2021, 19:54 Astrid Emde (OSGeo) via Discuss, < discuss@lists.osgeo.org> wrote: > Newsitem: > > https://www.osgeo.org/foundation-news/welcoming-our-new-osgeo-charter-members-

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] MapLibre

iler has indicated they would be > willing to move it to the MapLibre project, if it makes sense. No guarantee > it moves to MapLibre yet, but definitely that there will be an active fork > going forward. Luke, thanks for the update, it sounds v

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] MapLibre

'm late to the party and still making sense of what is the current status of the parts of the Mapbox GL ecosystem. Thanks Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] MapLibre

all dependencies required to build the existing open sources of the Mapbox ecosystem for mobile platforms [2] [1] https://forum.f-droid.org/t/updated-distribution-license-for-mapbox-mobile-maps-sdk/10201 [2] https://github.com/mapbox/mapbox-gl-native-android/issues/631 Best regards

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] How to set SHARE_DIR?

.org/ dedicated for your project? This is "the public list to talk about the Open Source Geospatial Foundation (OSGeo) in general" with many subscribers who are not interested in programming or any other low-level technical trivias. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Peer bonus awards for Jo Cook and Jared Morgan

n source. It also > includes a token financial contribution - enough to take the family out for > dinner at a nice restaurant. > > Well done Jo and Jared, you really deserve it: Congratulations! Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] LAS point clouds in various formats wanted

he libLAS test data should include older versions like 1.1 Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] License for documentation

On Fri, 28 Feb 2020 at 18:34, Pierre Abbat wrote: > > On Friday, 28 February 2020 09:59:12 EST Mateusz Loskot wrote: > > Unusual, very. > > https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#WhyNotGPLForManuals Well, GPL, that explains why I had no idea of such an approach. Best re

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] License for documentation

On Fri, 28 Feb 2020, 15:36 Pierre Abbat, wrote: > On Friday, 28 February 2020 02:40:30 EST Mateusz Loskot wrote: > > Are you considering separate licences, one for source code > > and one for documentation? > > Yes. Unusual, very. ML __

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] License for documentation

. Which > license should I use, and is it sufficient to put a statement of license in > the > files without putting the license itself in them? Are you considering separate licences, one for source code and one for documentation? Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot,

[OSGeo-Discuss] Fwd: [IIIF-Discuss] [Agenda] IIIF Community Call 2/26 - Maps

Forwarding IIIF community event info -- Forwarded message - From: Mr. Stace D Maples Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020, 23:29 Subject: [IIIF-Discuss] [Agenda] IIIF Community Call 2/26 - Maps To: iiif-disc...@googlegroups.com 2020-02-26 IIIF Maps Community Call 17:00pm CEST / 16:00pm UK /

[OSGeo-Discuss] Fwd: [IIIF-Discuss] IIIF Maps Community Group - Kick off meeting

209%40iiif.io?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> . -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

[OSGeo-Discuss] Fwd: [IIIF-Discuss] Registration for the 5th annual Geo4LibCamp 2020 and IIIF + Maps event is now open

, CA 94305 -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Proprietary GIS on our OSGeo website

GIS and label such non-kosher features like PostGIS Raster to allow FOSS-purist skip them. The whole thread feels like an internal scramble for external witch hunt. [1] http://blog.kathyreid.id.au/2010/07/19/open-source-in-name-only/ Best regards, --

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Marketing] Proprietary GIS on our OSGeo website

e Photoshop, only better" motto I like even when it contains > the name because it explicitly bashes it :) OSGeo Sponsors: 2007:Autodesk,LizardTech,INGRES 2008:Autodesk,LizardTech,INGRES,PCI Geomatics 2009: -//- 2010: -//- ... Sandro, I'm glad you can

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Confirm subscription to geoserver-devel. sent from SourceForge.net?

n Mat! No problem. Good it's not a security issue. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Confirm subscription to geoserver-devel. sent from SourceForge.net?

ould have looked more carefully at the headers). > Why would nabble have your details? Perhaps it's since my Nabble admin admin times and my e-mail has not been removed from nab...@osgeo.org. Anyway, thanks Jody Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://m

[OSGeo-Discuss] Confirm subscription to geoserver-devel. sent from SourceForge.net?

95.18003.1505669952236.javamail.administra...@n6.nabble.com> Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2017 17:38:59 + Reply-To: fwd+lists~2B1326929063815-3819232~40n6.nabble.com+noreply~40sourceforge.net+457910...@n6.nabble.com ... -- -- Mateusz Loskot, http://m

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Membership process & email

On 8 September 2017 at 12:34, Angelos Tzotsos wrote: > Hi, > > There was a discussion with the CROs at yesterday's board meeting, and a > proposal to use an automated system for nominations came up. move the traffic to dedicated electi...@lists.osgeo.org, perhaps ? Best reg

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Membership process & email

loding around this election. I fear > the election processes in the coming years already. Should we find another > way so propose and second nominees in the future to avoid flooding everyones > inbox? Jeroen, Good call. In previous years, I was arguing about the seconding idleness :) Best

[OSGeo-Discuss] Seconding Joana Simões Nomination

Hi, I'd like to second Joana Simões nomination Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Mentors money

it started. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Mentors money

lly specific about to any particular project. > I recalled, that was/used to be majority of choices. I did that too. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/m

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Flickr OSGeo group admins wanted

cting the CC-by-A license on our photos). I don't mind a change, if anyone wants to lead one. I have never used Google Photos, so I have no idea if it can aggregate photos from numerous users as Flickr group does. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, htt

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Flickr OSGeo group admins wanted

On 28 August 2017 at 15:54, Jeffrey Johnson wrote: > Happy to help and to 'represent' the marketing committee here. Done, you're in. Thanks -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lis

[OSGeo-Discuss] Flickr OSGeo group admins wanted

s4g/ Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Orfeo ToolBox Graduates Incubation

Congratulations OTB! ML On 27 Jul 2017 1:01 am, "Jody Garnett" wrote: > The Open Source Geospatial Foundation is pleased to announce that Orfeo > ToolBox (OTB) has graduated from > incubation and is now a full fledged OSGeo project. > > Orfeo ToolBox (OTB) is an

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Where to hire a FOSS4G freelane developer?

On 2017-05-11 9:35 AM, Luí­s Moreira de Sousa wrote: > Is there any resource within the OSGeo cosmos to help hiring freelance > developers from our community? For instance, an index of folk certified > by Arnulf? Does Arnulf run a certification program? Best regards, -- Mateusz Los

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Is it possible for properitery GIS vendor to market thier properitery product as Open ?

On 25 March 2017 at 13:01, Paolo Cavallini wrote: > Il 25/03/2017 12:56, Mateusz Loskot ha scritto: > >> They do, but at the same time, we wouldn't be where we are now >> in terms of civilisation development. yin/yang > > Not quite sure about that: Mateusz, do you hav

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Is it possible for properitery GIS vendor to market thier properitery product as Open ?

On 25 March 2017 at 12:54, Sandro Santilli wrote: > On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 12:43:29PM +0100, Mateusz Loskot wrote: > >> without a secret, there is no technology advancement > > I think this is a purely ideological position. > > Secrets can generate all kind of deseases, i

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Is it possible for properitery GIS vendor to market thier properitery product as Open ?

nology advancement, there is no motivation for development of counter-technologies. Mind you, communities and businesses have long recognised without open, there is no close and vice versa. Hence, so called business-friendly open source licenses, LocationTech, etc. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Wiki: InfrastructurePreferencesStatusQuo - call for update

On 20 March 2017 at 21:02, Cameron Shorter wrote: > I've added a line for OSGeo-Live FYI, I only walked through the ones in the "OSGeo Projects" frame at osgeo.org. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ Di

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Wiki: InfrastructurePreferencesStatusQuo - call for update

On 20 March 2017 at 00:46, Jody Garnett wrote: > Geotools SVN has been migrated. The repo is just for historical record. Fixed. Thanks Jody. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Wiki: InfrastructurePreferencesStatusQuo - call for update

I services used, but eventually ended up with CI tag in GitHub column. In majority if not all cases, if a project uses Travis CI/AppVeyor it does it via GitHub. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@l

[OSGeo-Discuss] Wiki: InfrastructurePreferencesStatusQuo - call for update

s wherever necessary. Thanks all in advance! Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Election 2016] Board of Directors elections results

Hi, Congratulations all the new board members! Best regards, Mateusz Loskot On 5 October 2016 at 11:17, Suchith Anand wrote: > Thank you to everyone who participated in the elections. > > Congratulations to the new Board. > > Best wish

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Possibly, The End of Gmane

On 29 July 2016 at 18:26, Hogan, Patrick (ARC-PX) wrote: > > Lars Ingebrigtsen thank you so much for a lifetime of generous giving. > > Whatever happens, you have given the world a wonderful gift! Patrick, Well said, Lars deserves lots of appreciation. Best regards, -- Mateusz

[OSGeo-Discuss] Possibly, The End of Gmane

Hi, Since many of OSGeo members use Gmane, this is relevant Gmane has been under attack and Lars, the founder of Gmane, is considering to shut it down: https://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/2016/07/28/the-end-of-gmane/ Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net

[OSGeo-Discuss] Udacity: Data Wrangling with MongoDB + OSM

ssing the quality of the data for validity, accuracy, completeness, consistency and uniformity, to clean the OpenStreetMap data for a part of the world that you care about. """ Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net _

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Mantra request (OsgeoID)

On 19 May 2016 at 15:30, Yves Jacolin wrote: > Hello, > > What is a mantra? Sorry for so this naive question :) http://www.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/ldap_create_user.py See the note starting with "Due to..." Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http:/

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] remove from mailing list

On 16 May 2016 at 10:13, oshanisinga wrote: > Please be kind enough to take me off the mailing list Please, you can do it yourself here https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss At the bottom, follow "To unsubscribe from Discuss, " Best regards, -- Mateusz

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Incubator] Should OSGeo accept "benevolent dictator" projects into OSGeo?

nsidered a suitable open and consensus based approach to governance." Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] What would you want from an OSGeo Git Service ?

On 15 April 2016 at 14:51, Sandro Santilli wrote: > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 02:21:22PM +0200, Mateusz Loskot wrote: > >> Finally, GitHub, wins: feature-wise, marketing-wise, with 'zero' maintenance >> - most, if not all, of our projects already prefer GitHub. > &

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] What would you want from an OSGeo Git Service ?

? [1]https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GitInfrastructureComparison Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

[OSGeo-Discuss] Buildbot resurrection, again (was: how did the Paris code sprint go)

fficient, unless majority of OSGeo projects say they would move from OSgeo SVN (and GitHub too). No critical mass, nothing to discuss. [1] http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/1214#comment:3 Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ D

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] how did the Paris code sprint go

you've done amazing job organizing the Paris sprint. It was a perfect combination of work and fun which also, AFAIS, was very productive event for the numerous projects. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ Discuss maili

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo/LocationTech relationship

nization behind, that has to prove it's capable to secure market share, and its position. Otherwise, the parent organization will simply shut it down as any failed project. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ Discu

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo/LocationTech relationship

On 13 November 2015 at 14:24, Jeff McKenna wrote: > > why would you create a separate > foundation with the exact same goals, and then later come back to the other > foundation saying "no, we love you. Give us the right to run your event". Bang! Jeff, thank you. Bes

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo guidelines for code hosting ?

tHub but our Trac too, could potentially be removed by allowing a hybrid authentication (i.e. sign in to Trac w/ your existing account on other social services), if Trac provides support for that. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateus

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo guidelines for code hosting ?

On 18 October 2015 at 17:15, Markus Neteler wrote: > On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Mateusz Loskot wrote: > ... >> Finally, with Sandro, we brainstormed idea of surveing the Community >> about their hosting needs/preferences. >> Sandro, Martin, Alex, have been putting

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo guidelines for code hosting ?

ilds triggered by commits, but we also observed it was killing our resoruces. Comparing CI services via GitHub/BitBucket/etc. with OSGeo Buildbot makes little sense. I'm inclined to judge, we can not afford to host CI for all OSGeo projects at comparable scale OSS-friendly CI services can. B

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo guidelines for code hosting ?

ture was unfriendly, badly designed, with lack of proper UX approach. Switch to the "awesome UX" platform like GitHub released those dormant potential. The new benefits introduced new costs in peer reviews and maintenance. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo thoughts on discussion/collaboration platform hosting

ld be useful to OSGeo projects? Yes, I guess so. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo guidelines for code hosting ?

On 17 October 2015 at 21:34, Anita Graser wrote: > On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 7:59 PM, Sandro Santilli wrote: >> On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 05:06:54PM +0200, Anita Graser wrote: >> > On Oct 17, 2015 12:10 PM, "Mateusz Loskot" wrote: >> > >> > What

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo guidelines for code hosting ?

On 17 Oct 2015 17:06, "Anita Graser" wrote: > On Oct 17, 2015 12:10 PM, "Mateusz Loskot" wrote: > > > > Finally, with Sandro, we brainstormed idea of surveing the Community > > about their hosting needs/preferences. > > Sandro, Martin, Alex

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo guidelines for code hosting ?

On 17 October 2015 at 10:22, Sandro Santilli wrote: > Given the number of OSGeo projects that are moving their code outside > of OSGeo infrastructure, Mateusz Loskot on IRC suggested to include > guidelines about what is or ins't accepted as a code repository > hosting for OS

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo sponsors ?

ferences between FOSS vs OSS, and that there is no mention of "Free" on the http://www.osgeo.org front page. Please, notice there is OSI, not FSF, logo on http://www.osgeo.org/content/foundation/about.html. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Renaming FOSS4G

o To for all your FOSS4G needs. > > > > > > Thanks, > > Regina > > > > From: discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org [mailto: discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Mateusz Loskot > Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2015 3:45 PM > To: Paul Ramsey > Cc: osgeo-discuss >

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Renaming FOSS4G

On 6 Oct 2015 18:28, "Paul Ramsey" wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 8:12 AM, Barry Rowlingson > wrote: > > Okay, this is probably sticking a match under a pile of dry wood but > > here goes... > > > > Can we rename The FOSS4G Conference to The OSGeo Conference? > > Get off my lawn. > > https://l

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Renaming FOSS4G

FOSS4G was not born by, but it FOSS4G started independently. FOSS4G is not a new conference, and its name is well-established. IMO, any confuson is artificial. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ Discuss mailing l

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo is becoming irrelevant. Here's why. Let's fix it.

a bit of wish that some purists would change their tone. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Election 2015] Board of Directors elections results

t regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo is becoming irrelevant. Here's why. Let's fix it.

e World. On the other, we gradually move to proprietary infrastructure based on non-FOSS, namely GitHub. The two sides clash, don't they? People may get confused. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Invitation to participate in the OSGeo membership consultations

I have filled the survey matching my answers ad close to my views as possible but I also give +1 to agree with Frank's comments 3 sie 2015 18:39 "Frank Warmerdam" napisał(a): > Folks, > > For what it's worth, I also do not feel comfortable with completing > the survey as it is currently structure

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] About "Interactive Map" patent application by Apple Inc.

Hi Brent, On 21 December 2013 21:55, Brent Wood wrote: > > - they are not patenting the touchscreen as a new patentable innovation, > they are patenting the adaptation of a single existing operation to the new > technology. Yes, I understand and the difference is clear here, during our conversat

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] About "Interactive Map" patent application by Apple Inc.

On 21 December 2013 21:15, Brent Wood wrote: > > Click on two points to display a route, touch two points to display a route > - this is natural progression from mouse based hardware to touch screen > mode. There should not be any patent there, it is just a generic change in > pointing device. Us

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Test polygons from "About Invalid, Valid and Clean Polygons"

1007%2F3-540-26772-7_1 >> >>> and uses PostGIS 0.6.2. >> >> I see, I missed that important detail. >> >>> I am not sure whether PostGIS >>> had an ST_IsValid function at the time. Anyway when I am back

[OSGeo-Discuss] Fwd: Test polygons from "About Invalid, Valid and Clean Polygons"

ubject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Test polygons from "About Invalid, Valid and Clean Polygons" To: Mateusz Loskot Cc: Paul Ramsey , discuss@lists.osgeo.org, Wilko Quak , Peter van Oosterom , Theo Tijssen Hi All, Maybe it's a bit late but I found the PostGIS sql script that we used 10 years

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Test polygons from "About Invalid, Valid and Clean Polygons"

est? > > ciao > Markus > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote: >> On 28 October 2013 00:31, Peter van Oosterom - OTB - TBM >> wrote: >>> Dear all, >>> >>> Quite sure the results are correct for PostGIS. >>&g

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Test polygons from "About Invalid, Valid and Clean Polygons"

the years shortly after! > Please find attached the test script. Peter, Not commenting on PostGIS capabilities at that time, but thank you very much for the scripts! Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ Discuss mailing li

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Test polygons from "About Invalid, Valid and Clean Polygons"

> had an ST_IsValid function at the time. Anyway when I am back in the office > I'll try to find the original scripts. That would be helpful, thanks! Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ Discuss mailing li

[OSGeo-Discuss] Test polygons from "About Invalid, Valid and Clean Polygons"

[1] http://www.springer.com/cda/content/document/cda_downloaddocument/9783540226109-c1.pdf Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

[OSGeo-Discuss] [coursera] Image and video processing

Hi, On Jan 20th 2014, the coursera starts the course on image processing, tools and algorithms. I think this may be of someone's interest here as well: https://www.coursera.org/course/images Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.losko

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGEO4W future

On 23 September 2013 22:49, Tamas Szekeres wrote: > 2013/9/23 Mateusz Loskot >> >> Although I suggested CoApp route as I think it's the right modern way >> to package FOSS for Windows, >> I don't think I will be able to get actively involved in this project

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGEO4W future

I make after hours). Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net "Participation in this whole process is a form of torture" ~~ Szalony ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] RE : Re: OSGEO4W future

On 21 September 2013 23:35, Tamas Szekeres wrote: > > And so on (anyone is welcomed to add further experiences or ideas) I think it may be worth to remind about CoApp: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/osgeo4w-dev/2013-April/002168.html Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Software Freedom Day - Today Saturday September 21, 2013

)? (_)? (_)? Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net "Participation in this whole process is a form of torture" ~~ Szalony ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Looking for a one pager write up for Why Open Source is good.

he only trustworthy body. So, suggesting GNU as the only credible source of the sacred books and terminology is not a good idea. What about OSI, what about all those open source and free software initiatives and concepts which do not relate to GNU or FSF. There are many flavours of open source a

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Has PostGIS in Action gone free?

ed from the server now. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net "Participation in this whole process is a form of torture" ~~ Szalony ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Board Election Results 2013

Great job! Thank you Arnulf, the election MC, and all the CM's for votes. Great board we've got. Mateusz Loskot (Sent from mobile, apology for top-posting and broken quotes) On 7 Sep 2013 17:51, "Arnulf Christl" wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: S

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] congrats to the new board members

x27;d like to join Dimitris congratulations to newly elected board members and thanks to previous and current members as well. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot (Sent from mobile, apology for top-posting and broken quotes) ___ Discuss mailing list D

[OSGeo-Discuss] Has PostGIS in Action gone free?

7;t we OSGeo be more considerate? Best regards -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net "Participation in this whole process is a form of torture" ~~ Szalony ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Job offers for OSGeo experts

Josh, there is Jobs mailing list at http://lists.osgeo.org, so that's one place to go. Second is the directory of service providers available from the osgeo.org. Mateusz Loskot (Sent from mobile, apology for top-posting and broken quotes) On 23 Jun 2013 10:45, "Josh Fox" wr

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] The OSGeo response to the proposed "GeoServices REST API" document [was: Would you be concerned ...]

has done and is going to >>>> do anyway. >> >> >> Out of curiosity, how does this compare to the process by which KML >> became an OGC standard? > > > That was the first really contentious issue I experienced at the

[OSGeo-Discuss] Outercurve Open Source Software Conference 2013

e public freedom from DLL hell as well as Cygwin, MSys and other such prosthesis. [1] http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/Garrett-Serack-Open-Source-on-Windows-and-the-CoApp-Project Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo as organization at Ohloh?

On 15 March 2013 15:46, Angelos Tzotsos wrote: > Hi, > > OSGeoLive is missing from the list ;) > https://www.ohloh.net/p/OSGeo-Live/ Done -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.os

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo as organization at Ohloh?

help. > Would you mind if I also was listed as an 'admin' > for this? Sure, I will add you as admin. I'll be back on that. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo

[OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo as organization at Ohloh?

Hi, The Ohloh service launched beta of organizationst: http://www.ohloh.net/orgs Most if not all OSGeo projects are present at Ohloh. Would it be a good idea to add OSGeo there? Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ Discuss

[OSGeo-Discuss] [planet.osgeo.org] Review your blog feed

lanet, e-mail us on planet (at) osgeo (dot) org Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] NEWS: Venkatesh Raghavan Receives 2012 Sol Katz Award

dgkin's Lymphoma > for almost a decade, Sol died April 23, 1999 in bed. His legacy will > always live on in the GFOSS world. > > -- > > > _______ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Foss4g2013] Code sprints at FOSS4G 2013

? It sounds like a kind of Shell loyalty programme for developers: 1 litre of fuel earns 1 point; get 25 points and you'll get free coffee ;) Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org h

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [OSGeo-Conf] Code sprints at FOSS4G 2013

g. +1 Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Sol Katz Award Nomination procedure (was Nomination for Venkatesh Raghavan)

's lead when I nominated Chris. >> >> But hey, we're an open community, I think it's even in the name >> somewhere. And spreading a little recognition around to hard working >> members of our community surely doesn't hurt. > > I di

[OSGeo-Discuss] [Article] Can the Terms of the GPL Prevent GNU/Linux being used for War?

Hi, I'm forwarding potentially interesting article from FSM: http://www.freesoftwaremagazine.com/articles/can_terms_gpl_prevent_gnulinux_being_used_war with two of OSGeo projects mentioned. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.losko

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Board Election 2012 Results

s. There were five seats open and they have been > filled by, in alphabetical order: > * Anne Ghisla > * Jeff McKenna > * Daniel Morissette > * Cameron Shorter > * Frank Warmerdam Congratulations to the new board members! Arnulf, big thanks! Anne, be strong! ;-) Be

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] The importance of a project's license

Ragi, Thank you very much for sharing your experience. You've saved me a lot of time -- Mateusz Loskot (Sent from phone, apology for any top-posting or broken quoting) On 27 Jul 2012 21:11, "rburhum" wrote: > As someone who has done several for-pay projects (both big and s

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] The importance of a project's license

On 27 July 2012 15:27, Seven (aka Arnulf) wrote: > On 07/27/2012 11:45 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote: >> On 27 July 2012 05:55, Alex Mandel wrote: >>> This is a really interesting debate. Reading the links provided it also >>> appears to be a mixed bag about acceptance o

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] The importance of a project's license

On 27 July 2012 11:47, Markus Neteler wrote: > On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Mateusz Loskot wrote: >> On 27 July 2012 05:55, Alex Mandel wrote: >>> This is a really interesting debate. Reading the links provided it also >>> appears to be a mixed bag about acceptan

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] The importance of a project's license

GPL is dying, of natural causes. http://ostatic.com/blog/the-top-licenses-on-github Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

  1   2   3   4   >