[OSGeo-Discuss] RE: Board Nomination -- Regina Obe Decline

2011-08-10 Thread Paragon Corporation
David, Thank you very much for this nomination. It is a great honor to be so well respected by you. It is also with much regret that I decline your offer. I really had intended on accepting this, but after thinking about the extra responsibility this position would require, I realized I w

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Is Your Project In OSGeo Labs? -- Geocoders

2012-12-08 Thread Paragon Corporation
Steve, Add to your list this one: http://www.gisgraphy.com/ I think it's a mix of lots of things but uses OSM and Geonames for data source as far as I can tell and backend PostGIS and I think Java Servlets for application layer as far as I can tell. LGPL v3 licensed it seems. I came across this

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Gender bias in nominations

2014-07-24 Thread Paragon Corporation
I agree with Jo and Maria. I've always felt welcome in OSGeo primarily because I share many interests and philosophies with many of you. I think gender quotas will in long run do more damage than good. I'd hate to think people think I am where I am because of my gender or that people let me get a

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] ?Re: Fwd: Nomination for Ko Nagase

2015-08-30 Thread Paragon Corporation
+1 for Ko Nagase. He's been a great help with pgRouting work. Thanks, Regina From: discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org [mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Anita Graser Sent: Sunday, August 30, 2015 3:31 PM To: discuss@lists.osgeo.org Subject: [OSGeo-Discuss] ?Re: Fwd: Nomi

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Renaming FOSS4G

2015-10-06 Thread Paragon Corporation
We really should have just gone with GeoBonkers' Meeting back then. It speaks to me on so many levels. In all seriousness though, I think changing the name now that everyone has gotten used to it and knows what it means is not a good use of anybody's time. As Jeff noted, there are other w

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo guidelines for code hosting ?

2015-10-18 Thread Paragon Corporation
A lot of what instigated this conversation is what PostGIS should do? stick with SVN/Trac, get rid of SVN and just move everything to GitHub, or have an OSGeo GIT and a GitHub mirror and still keep trac. I don't think it makes sense for us to completely ditch github, but then I also think there