Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Code of Conduct Implementation Plan Was: Code of Conduct in Real Case

2015-06-24 Thread Eli Adam
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Eli Adam wrote: > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 5:27 AM, Bart van den Eijnden > wrote: >> Hey Jeff, >> >> if you truly feel this way, please put forward a motion on the next board >> meeting. This needs to be decided by the board as a whole I guess. >> >> Personally I

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Code of Conduct Implementation Plan Was: Code of Conduct in Real Case

2015-06-24 Thread Eli Adam
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 5:27 AM, Bart van den Eijnden wrote: > Hey Jeff, > > if you truly feel this way, please put forward a motion on the next board > meeting. This needs to be decided by the board as a whole I guess. > > Personally I’m not in favour of destroying all that good work, but I also

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Code of Conduct Implementation Plan Was: Code of Conduct in Real Case

2015-06-24 Thread Jeff McKenna
Hi Kate, I came up with a 1st September deadline in my head because I don't want the FOSS4G event to come along without some sort of way to handle reports. We can ignore the deadline, but I wanted to let everyone know that a process is really needed, besides text on a webpage. You and I an

[OSGeo-Discuss] Code of Conduct Implementation Plan Was: Code of Conduct in Real Case

2015-06-24 Thread Kate Chapman
Hi Jeff, I thought this comment deserved its own discussion. While I agree that not having an implementation plan for the Code of Conduct is not acceptable I view it as just as unacceptable to switch to a diversity statement. When I registered for FOSS4G last week it was with the understanding tha