Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] FOSS4G North America - Blind voting [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2013-01-17 Thread Seven (aka Arnulf)
> [mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] *On Behalf Of *Bruce > Bannerman *Sent:* Thursday, January 17, 2013 3:17 PM *To:* Cameron > Shorter; discuss@lists.osgeo.org *Subject:* Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] > FOSS4G North America - Blind voting [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] > > > > Camero

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] FOSS4G North America - Blind voting [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2013-01-17 Thread Fawcett, David (MPCA)
m: discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org [mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Bruce Bannerman Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 3:17 PM To: Cameron Shorter; discuss@lists.osgeo.org Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] FOSS4G North America - Blind voting [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Cameron, Agreed. A

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] FOSS4G North America - Blind voting [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2013-01-17 Thread Cameron Shorter
ppy to have them join the committee. David. *From:*discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org [mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] *On Behalf Of *Bruce Bannerman *Sent:* Thursday, January 17, 2013 3:17 PM *To:* Cameron Shorter; discuss@lists.osgeo.org *Subject:* Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] FOSS4G North Ame

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] FOSS4G North America - Blind voting [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2013-01-17 Thread Bruce Bannerman
Cameron, Agreed. As has been discussed in similar threads, and as we found for Sydney, it helps the LOC determine relative popularity of presentations for room allocation. However, perhaps the actual final results do not need to be published. Presenters are either accepted or they're not, aft