Thanks for your insights guys.
I have also noticed that a lot of Java based projects use the JTS
library for geometries, while this library does not really follow any
specs (afaik). Do you guys feel that this is becoming a problem? I'm
asking this because there is also a JTS4GWT project out
It follows the SFSQL spec.
The only problem in this space is money. Frankly with out Martin being stubborn
and the hard math we would not have an open source spatial industry.
We see many ports of jts but what is needed is commitment.
On 14/07/2011, at 5:22 PM, Pieter De Graef
Sent: July 14, 2011 07:26
To: OSGeo Discussions
Cc: discuss@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Geomajas Geometry Project
[SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
It follows the SFSQL spec.
The only problem in this space is money. Frankly with out Martin being
stubborn and the hard math we would not have an open
Pieter,
I agree with Jody.
I'm seeing increasing demand for clients that can utilise vector data
constrained by an application schema.
Europe is probably most advanced in this work with Inspire.
In Australia we have a lot of work currently at research and at implementation
stage trying to
