Dear all,
FWIW:
Helmut it also part of OSGeo's do-ocracy, being this years one of the
main GSoC admins with all the related work, being active project
contributor (see the related project ML) and more. Just FYI...
Kind regards,
Markus
___
Discuss mailin
2017 15:46 (GMT-05:00)
> To: Jeffrey Johnson
> Cc: OSGeo Discussions , Helmut Kudrnovsky
>
> Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Note the LocationTech badge is not showing
> correctly
>
> When we met up in Chicago to set up OSGEO the desire was to be as inclusive
> as possibl
(GMT-05:00)
To: Jeffrey Johnson
Cc: OSGeo Discussions , Helmut Kudrnovsky
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Note the LocationTech badge is not showing
correctly
When we met up in Chicago to set up OSGEO the desire was to be as inclusive as
possible. I donate alot of time to OSGEO when I could be
When we met up in Chicago to set up OSGEO the desire was to be as inclusive
as possible. I donate alot of time to OSGEO when I could be doing something
fun like coding and I'm getting fed up with charter members popping up on
the mailing lists and complaining about stuff that they haven't done
anyt
Just for clarity and background. We announced the project form on discuss
and imported the results/submissions of that form. There hasn't been any
process other than that up to now.
For the record, I'm very much in favor of a "big tent" approach. If a
software had an OSI approved license and deals
And istSOS :-)
Il 18 ago 2017 5:25 PM, "Sandro Santilli" ha scritto:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 09:19:52PM +0200, Helmut Kudrnovsky wrote:
>
> > Will locationtech also promote OSGeo projects?
>
> This is an interesting question, especially as LocationTech is
> against GPL-licensed projects (like
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 09:19:52PM +0200, Helmut Kudrnovsky wrote:
> Will locationtech also promote OSGeo projects?
This is an interesting question, especially as LocationTech is
against GPL-licensed projects (like GRASS, QGIS, PostGIS)
--strk;
___
Dis
Hi Helmut and Maxi,
Thanks for expressing your concerns about listing
of projects and badges on the beta website as a
part of the OSGeo "website/rebranding" initiative.
As mentioned by Helena, earlier on this thread, the
listing of projects and display of project badges on the beta website
is an
Someone would answer that is a do-ocracy :-)
Apart from this, I also share the same concerns of Helmut and would like to
have a clear rule/strategy on this...
Best
Maxi
Il 17 ago 2017 9:19 PM, "Helmut Kudrnovsky" ha scritto:
> (Taken from https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/2017-August/
Helmut
- this is the open discussion that we are having, so please keep letting us
know your concerns - they are not ignored and you are not alone. We need
the input from the community to make the decisions on what is presented at
the OSGeo web site and how.
Thanks a lot for your reviews and comm
(Taken from https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/2017-August/035453.html)
"Note the LocationTech badge is not not showing correctly"
now I am, as an OSGeo charter member, really really confused about this.
What I'm really missing here is an open discussion and decision making how we,
as a
11 matches
Mail list logo
