So elections are to add to our membership, then elections should support
that activity. Maybe the conversation needs to be also about what OSGeo
wants out of its members because that would drive the process of how to
select them.
-Steve
On 5/7/2014 7:44 AM, Seven (aka Arnulf) wrote:
-BEG
Also note that I've already planned to discuss elections at the next
Board meeting next week
(http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Board_Meeting_2014-05-15)...this likely
woke up the Seven-borg :)
-jeff
On 2014-05-07, 8:44 AM, Seven (aka Arnulf) wrote:
> Folks, there always was a lot of discussion and d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Folks,
there always was a lot of discussion and different opinions about how we
manage OSGeo membership.
This usually happened when the elections process had already started.
After the fact everything quieted down again until - same procedure as
every
