On 17/12/15 20:28, Jody Garnett wrote:
We have a different understanding of foss4g Maxi.
I imagine that this is a reaction to
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 4:08 AM Massimiliano Cannata
> wrote:
>> 4- FOSS4G is the OSGeo's label of their Free and Open Source
>> Software For Geospatial confe
All,
I believe the point is not if it was nice or not to receive a message for
being aware of events (that we will be aware in any case thanks to the
social media and mailing lists) but rather if it is appropriate (or even
legal?) perform these unsolicited mail campaign and the sharing of these
dat
I support Paul and Steven's approach (and thank them for their actions to
help keep the community aware of events) -- but I think it's also certainly
the case that there is always a set of people on our mailing lists who have
a strong preference that their details are not shared in a way they do no
Hi Maxi,
I love the constructive research that you have started here.
Email privacy was not as topical when foss4g email lists started getting
collected, and tracing technologies such as mail chimp were as
assessable as mail chimp is now. So we are right to retrospectively
develop our policy i
Thanks for the productive discussion - some of those privacy policies seem
to be website specific ( rather than for an organization as a whole ).
We just are rebooting the webcom so the timing is good for a privacy
discussion. It may be easier to start here and then branch out to project /
committ
Dear Gert, deal all,
after a few days of discussion I would like to sum up some considerations
to re-focus to subject of my first e-mail and that in my opinion should led
OSGeo foundation to at least one or two argument for discussion.
1- Some FOSS4G events made use of "aggressive" marketing strat
