Marc there is also the opportunity for us to grow as an organization.
Many of the points brought up in this discussion, and the earlier one on
listing open source projects, were voiced by myself back in March as I
gradually came to terms with this scope of work. I think it was Jeffrey who
first
Hi all,
An observation from my end:
this apparently has become an argument to frame a person - who has done more
for our community than I can list - as if he is insulting and offending that
same community. Unsuccessfully, I am glad. From the almost deadly silence I
deduct no collective cry
Jody this is not respectful of me and the community. Might I know why the
people working for the project want ABSOLUTELY to keep the names and links to
proprietary software on our open source software website?
Anyhow, I think that the Board can express ourselves about this point. I
remember
Dear Jody
Personally I agree with Helmut and I don't see any necessity of putting
"similar proprietary software" on our web pages. I don't think proprietary
software need to be advertized. We are a Foundation about Open Software and I
want to see the open source projects on the website that we
Jody, I see very difficult the existence of a vast majority of GIS industry
that has honestly not heard about open source yet. Anyway I refuse the idea of
"similar proprietary software" because our projects are much more than pieces
of code. Behind our software there are communities and
