Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] R: [Board] Not graduated OSGeo project...

2016-10-21 Thread Codrina Maria Ilie
Dear Maxi, I agree with Maria. In my understanding, the Data4All initiative should be self standing within OSGeo. My reasons revolve around the idea that open (geo)data extends far beyond the public sector (data collected and/or produced by national agencies within monitoring activities)

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] R: [Board] Not graduated OSGeo project...

2016-10-21 Thread Suchith Anand
:-) Suchith From: Discuss <discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org> on behalf of Maria Antonia Brovelli <maria.brove...@polimi.it> Sent: 21 October 2016 1:17 PM To: Codrina Maria Ilie; discuss@lists.osgeo.org Subject: [OSGeo-Discuss] R: [Board] Not gra

[OSGeo-Discuss] R: [Board] Not graduated OSGeo project...

2016-10-21 Thread Maria Antonia Brovelli
Dear Maxi In my opinion it is more a Committee than a working group inside another one. The data, with their variety, are more than those of direct interest in science. My 2 cents. Maria Inviato dal mio dispositivo Samsung Messaggio originale Da: Massimiliano Cannata