On 20/05/2019 07:03, Maria Antonia Brovelli wrote:
Anyhow there is a Code of Conduct Committee. If they decided that the criteria
as a whole are against inclusion, we would change as they propose.
My understanding of the Code of Conduct is that it was intended to apply
to the conduct of
On 20/05/2019 07:28, Jonathan Moules wrote:
> People with more than 40 years can apply.
Yes but they suffer a 20% penalty, that's a very significant penalty and
is explicitly discriminatory against what is commonly considered a
"protected attribute" (age), hence my raising the issue.
>
Hi Maria,
> People with more than 40 years can apply.
Yes but they suffer a 20% penalty, that's a very significant penalty and
is explicitly discriminatory against what is commonly considered a
"protected attribute" (age), hence my raising the issue.
> Moeover the scores will be
Thanks for your comment. I have a different opinion.
People with more than 40 years can apply.
Moeover the scores will be compensated by their experience, as there are also
scores for this:
1. Proposer’s documented experience in education and training: 20 (max)
And I believe that, for a
