-
From: geotux_tux...@linuxmail.org
To: discuss@lists.osgeo.org
Sent: Wed, Apr 21, 2010 9:57 am
Subject: Fwd: [OSGeo-Discuss] RE: FOSS4G Technology review
presentations - Web clients
Hi Cameron.
Sure! I would like it a lot. I plan to publish the 4th version of the
comparison on next month
://geotux.tuxfamily.org/
-Original Message-
From: geotux_tux...@linuxmail.org
To: discuss@lists.osgeo.org
Sent: Wed, Apr 21, 2010 9:57 am
Subject: Fwd: [OSGeo-Discuss] RE: FOSS4G Technology review presentations - Web
clients
Hi Cameron.
Sure! I would like it a lot. I plan to publish
pm
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] RE: FOSS4G Technology review presentations - Web
clients
Arnulf,
I'd be interested to hear whether German's offer of comparing webmap projects
would be of value to you in preparing your foss4g presentation about
webmapping.
German,
I am very excited
(Sorry, I don't know how to follow the thread, I'm just registered)
Hi all, I'm Germán Carrillo and it's a pleasure to have been invited to this
discussion, thanks Cameron!
As Cameron said, I've been mantaining a web map client comparison for the last
year and a half. I've received support
Hi Cameron,
I would be happy to bring my input regarding MapFish.
Cédric
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 9:59 PM, Cameron Shorter
cameron.shor...@gmail.comwrote:
Pieter, good to hear your interest and to hear that geomajas would be
covered.
Anyone interested to step forward for Openlayers, Mapfish or
Cameron,
I can provide input on the Fusion client.
Mike
Cédric Moullet wrote:
Hi Cameron,
I would be happy to bring my input regarding MapFish.
Cédric
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 9:59 PM, Cameron Shorter
cameron.shor...@gmail.com mailto:cameron.shor...@gmail.com wrote:
Pieter, good to
Cameron,
if the others are too, I would be interested in such a comparison.
My main question wouls be, exactly what would we be testing? Performance
(how?), functionality, ease-of-use, architecture,
I still have to check my schedule, but I believe I can set aside a
enough time. I will
