IL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: [OSGeo-Discuss] Re: Raster data on RDBMS
> Sent: Oct 31 '08 10:24
>
> Well, now we get to the crux of the matter, what are the benefits? Let's
> analyze this a bit more to see if anything seems important. You mention:
>
> 1) S
ot.com <http://www.topodepot.com>
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Gilberto Camara
Sent: Thu 10/30/2008 8:25 PM
To: discuss@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: [OSGeo-Discuss] Re: Raster data on RDBMS
Dear all
I would like to take a broader view of the issue of raster data in a
DBMS. Issues
to
your chosen tile size. What do you do with the leftovers?
More?
Another 2 cents,
Roger
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Lucena, Ivan
Sent: Fri 10/31/2008 1:20 AM
To: OSGeo Discussions
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Re: Raster data on RDBMS
Paul,
Th
definition, spatial
indexation, etc. but they should not drag down the performance.
Just my two cents.
Ivan
> ---Original Message---
> From: Paul Ramsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Re: Raster data on RDBMS
> Sent: Oct 31 '08 02:11
>
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Gilberto Camara
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> but the benefits of having
> raster data on a DBMS are much more important.
And those benefits are?
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/
Dear all
I would like to take a broader view of the issue of raster data in a
DBMS. Issues of performance are relevant, but the benefits of having
raster data on a DBMS are much more important.
Consider that raster sensors and grid models are by far the dominant
source of new geospatial data. If
