On 21.05.2010, at 22:11, karsten vennemann wrote:
> Ok I was not yet familiar how MapProxy really works - from what I read it
> seemed not to store any physical tiles I thought (only the request
> parameters), but I guess that is wrong ..
It does cache tiles permanently on disk. It does this in a
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 06:24:26PM -0300, Fabio Renzo Panettieri wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-05-21 at 13:17 -0700, Karsten-3-2 wrote:
> > Yes. What I want to do is simply to find out the fastest options to render
> > on
> > the fly from raw data imagery
> > (no tiles whatsoever stored on disk in addit
Sorry about, the empty msg before.
On Fri, 2010-05-21 at 13:17 -0700, Karsten-3-2 wrote:
> Yes. What I want to do is simply to find out the fastest options to render on
> the fly from raw data imagery
> (no tiles whatsoever stored on disk in addition to the raw data ). I will
> check out what Sp
On Fri, 2010-05-21 at 13:17 -0700, Karsten-3-2 wrote:
> Yes. What I want to do is simply to find out the fastest options to render on
> the fly from raw data imagery
> (no tiles whatsoever stored on disk in addition to the raw data ). I will
> check out what SpatialCache is...
> Karsten
_
Yes. What I want to do is simply to find out the fastest options to render on
the fly from raw data imagery
(no tiles whatsoever stored on disk in addition to the raw data ). I will
check out what SpatialCache is...
Karsten
--
View this message in context:
http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.co
Thanks all so far for the responses.
Re: Bob I will check out your site more closely . And I will try to find out
about dropping and adding pixels with MapServer (not familiar with that
yet...)
> From: miblon
> In my opinion (but of course Karsten needs to answer that
> himself) he needs WMS as
