On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> However... maybe someone should push the OSGeo community to send private
> nominations more?
Andrea,
I don't have a strong position on public vs. private, but I will
note we are receiving lots of private nominations, as is
the case each year
On 12-09-18 4:34 PM, Andrea Aime wrote:
>
> However... maybe someone should push the OSGeo community to send private
> nominations more?
> I have no idea, no raw data, but in the years I have had the impression
> that the
> importance of nomination period could be stressed more, thus getting more
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Daniel Morissette wrote:
> While I am all for openness in general, I share Howard's concerns in this
> specific case and think we should continue with private nominations.
>
Agreed (for what is worth). It would be sad if we started seeing sorts of
"mass voting" a
While I am all for openness in general, I share Howard's concerns in
this specific case and think we should continue with private nominations.
Daniel
On 12-09-18 11:15 AM, Howard Butler wrote:
On Sep 18, 2012, at 9:53 AM, Richard Greenwood
wrote:
I agree that this is the first year that
+1
-mpg
On Sep 18, 2012, at 9:15 AM, Howard Butler wrote:
> I disagree. The history of the award has been a cloistered deliberation of
> private nominations. The award is not a political exercise, or at least it
> hasn't been to this point, and public nominations tip things toward the
> lob
El 18/09/2012 17:15, "Howard Butler" escribió:
>
>
> On Sep 18, 2012, at 9:53 AM, Richard Greenwood <
richard.greenw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I agree that this is the first year that nominations have been
> > publicly discussed and it is a departure from previous years. I
> > followed Jeff's lea
With Howard.
--
Puneet Kishor
science, data, policy... yeah
On Sep 18, 2012, at 6:15 PM, Howard Butler wrote:
>
> On Sep 18, 2012, at 9:53 AM, Richard Greenwood
> wrote:
>
>> I agree that this is the first year that nominations have been
>> publicly discussed and it is a departure from pr
ts.osgeo.org
> [mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Howard Butler
> Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2012 10:15 AM
> To: Richard Greenwood
> Cc: OSGeo Discussions
> Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Sol Katz Award Nomination procedure (was
> Nomination for Venkatesh Raghavan)
Katz Award Nomination procedure (was
Nomination for Venkatesh Raghavan)
On Sep 18, 2012, at 9:53 AM, Richard Greenwood
wrote:
> I agree that this is the first year that nominations have been
> publicly discussed and it is a departure from previous years. I
> followed Jeff'
Hi Bart,
The process can change each year, but last year each member of the
Selection Committee ranked their top two choices, and the person with
the most first place votes won.
Selection committee members have always been allowed to nominate.
Looking back at old selection committee emails/discu
On 18 September 2012 16:15, Howard Butler wrote:
>
> On Sep 18, 2012, at 9:53 AM, Richard Greenwood
> wrote:
>
>> I agree that this is the first year that nominations have been
>> publicly discussed and it is a departure from previous years. I
>> followed Jeff's lead when I nominated Chris.
>>
>
On Sep 18, 2012, at 9:53 AM, Richard Greenwood
wrote:
> I agree that this is the first year that nominations have been
> publicly discussed and it is a departure from previous years. I
> followed Jeff's lead when I nominated Chris.
>
> But hey, we're an open community, I think it's even in the
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Jeff McKenna
wrote:
> My feelings exactly. Thanks Rich.
I'm getting deja-vu all over again:
http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/2012-July/010662.html
Barry
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http:/
I don't want to be a PITA, but I want to bring up another point for discussion.
Is it a good idea for people from the selection committee to be nominating?
That kind of defeats their "neutral" position.
Or how does the selection committee normally come to a decision? Consensus,
voting, somethin
On 12-09-18 11:53 AM, Richard Greenwood wrote:
> I agree that this is the first year that nominations have been
> publicly discussed and it is a departure from previous years. I
> followed Jeff's lead when I nominated Chris.
>
> But hey, we're an open community, I think it's even in the name
> som
I agree that this is the first year that nominations have been
publicly discussed and it is a departure from previous years. I
followed Jeff's lead when I nominated Chris.
But hey, we're an open community, I think it's even in the name
somewhere. And spreading a little recognition around to hard w
16 matches
Mail list logo
