All,
My thoughts on the Incubation process (which are in the archives over the
years) was generally that it was too big a step in many cases for projects to
take. I've always wondered about some sort of process that could last much
longer and with many more steps in it before being declared
Interaction with other committees is separate to the the incubation process
currently.
I like the idea of the straight up reward system:
- participation (provision of quick start etc gets you included on the live dvd)
- provision of course materials perhaps could allow projects to participate in
Il 12/06/2011 02:56, Mark Lucas ha scritto:
> I was actually thinking of the reverse - incubation graduation would be
> contingent on
> getting on the OSGeo-Live disk. Agree it should be gradual, should start out
> as a goal.
I think now incubating and graduated project is not very obvious to
On Jun 11, 2011, at 8:24 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote:
> Mark,
> Yes I agree that OSGeo-Live also provides a good framework for the periodic
> review of projects beyond incubation.
>
> What we have on our side is:
> 1. A periodic release schedule
> 2. A valuable business driver which attracts proj
ts.osgeo.org>
Cc: OSGeo-edu
Subject: [OSGeo-Edu] Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Training and certification
I'm not going to weigh in on the certification question -- I don't
understand the companies out there doing training and the issues raised
by Cameron and others. Apologies in advance for a
ps have been properly vetted
>> and created. The Center would offer to sit with yourself and the OSGeo
>> board at the forthcoming FOSS4G to discuss collaboration.
>>
>> Phil Davis
>> Director and PI
>>
>>
>>
arlie Schweik [cschw...@pubpol.umass.edu]
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 8:31 AM
To: discuss@lists.osgeo.org
Cc: OSGeo-edu
Subject: [OSGeo-Edu] Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Training and certification
I'm not going to weigh in on the certification question -- I don't
understand the companies out there