Frank,
I like the way you define the different areas of legal risk OSGeo and
members face, and suggest actions that OSGeo should take under these
circumstances. Your suggestions make sense to me.
To complete the loop, I suggest:
1. Legal review of your suggestions to confirm you have the key i
Arnulf Christl wrote:
The most basic kind of protection that OSGeo can give is that it can
take any legal action because it is a legal entity. This alone is
already much more than the GeoTools Project currently has.
Additionally OSGeo does have funds to spend and when it comes hard to
hard it w
Jody Garnett wrote:
Arnulf Christl wrote:
Cameron Shorter wrote:
Good processes + no money is an acceptable strategy so long as we
have consciously made this decision and everyone is aware of the
strategy.
Hello,
keeping budgets low already is a corporate strategy of OSGeo as far as
I am co
Arnulf Christl wrote:
Cameron Shorter wrote:
Good processes + no money is an acceptable strategy so long as we
have consciously made this decision and everyone is aware of the
strategy.
Hello,
keeping budgets low already is a corporate strategy of OSGeo as far as
I am concerned. I am eager t
sions
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Board Proposal: Statement of OSGeo Legal
Support
Cameron Shorter wrote:
> Good processes + no money is an acceptable strategy so long as we have
> consciously made this decision and everyone is aware of the strategy.
Hello,
keeping budgets low already is a corpor
-mpg
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Landon Blake
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 7:56 AM
To: OSGeo Discussions
Subject: RE: [OSGeo-Discuss] Board Proposal: Statement of
OSGeo Legal Support
Cameron,
I think this is an excellent idea
ROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jody Garnett
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 10:50 AM
To: OSGeo Discussions
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Board Proposal: Statement of OSGeo Legal
Support
Not quite yet Landon; Jo was kind enough to contact someone with a few
questions already (I
:* OSGeo Discussions
*Subject:* Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Board Proposal: Statement of OSGeo
Legal Support
IMO
Good call Cameron.
In this day and age it would pay to be proactive on these types of
issues.
It's been a while since I last looked at this.
From memory, a number of
30, 2007 10:27 PM
To: OSGeo Discussions
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Board Proposal: Statement of OSGeo Legal
Support
IMO
Good call Cameron.
In this day and age it would pay to be proactive on these types of
issues.
It's been a while since I last looked at this.
>From m
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Board Proposal: Statement of OSGeo Legal Support
Good processes + no money is an acceptable strategy so long as we have
consciously made this decision and everyone is aware of the strategy.
Allan Doyle wrote:
>
> On Oct 30, 2007, at 15:09 , Michael P. Gerlek wrote:
&
inal Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Landon Blake
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 7:56 AM
To: OSGeo Discussions
Subject: RE: [OSGeo-Discuss] Board Proposal: Statement of
OSGeo Legal Support
Cameron,
I think this is an excellent idea, and a lawyer sho
ns
Subject: RE: [OSGeo-Discuss] Board Proposal: Statement of
OSGeo Legal Support
Cameron,
I think this is an excellent idea, and a lawyer should definitely be
consulted. I wonder if the legal staff at the Software Freedom
Conservancy could assist.
Landon
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTE
, handle this?
-mpg
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Landon Blake
> Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 7:56 AM
> To: OSGeo Discussions
> Subject: RE: [OSGeo-Discuss] Board Proposal: Statement of
> OSGeo Legal Supp
Cameron,
I think this is an excellent idea, and a lawyer should definitely be
consulted. I wonder if the legal staff at the Software Freedom
Conservancy could assist.
Landon
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cameron Shorter
Sent: Tuesday, O
14 matches
Mail list logo
