I know some of you want to know why we aren’t just going to use the
GeoAPI interfaces. I don’t know enough about the GeoAPI code to say that
it won’t be used. I think that will need to be part of our research
process. It would make sense to use GeoAPI as a home for common
interfaces if
GeoTools using
the GeoAPI interfaces for a CRS library implementation in Java?
Landon
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin Deoliveira
Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 1:20 PM
To: OSGeo Discussions
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Research
Landon Blake wrote:
I know some of you want to know why we aren’t just going to use the
GeoAPI interfaces. I don’t know enough about the GeoAPI code to say
that it won’t be used. I think that will need to be part of our
research process. It would make sense to use GeoAPI as a home for
Landon Blake wrote:
I agree simplicity (and the broad adoption that results from simplicity)
is a primary goal. We shouldn't let GeoAPI stand in the way of that.
Even just taking the abstractions as defined by GeoAPI and turning them
into classes would remove one level of complexity.
I
