> > Whence licence exceptions e.g. in ExtJS
> > (http://extjs.com/products/floss-exception.php)
> Assuming that you consider them valid. Red Hat Legal is "firm that this
> exception clause isn't valid." --
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471509#c2
Thanx for the precision Chris.
is?
I can't find a license file which indicates this.
What I have missed ?
Jérôme
- Original Message - From: "P Kishor"
To: "OSGeo Discussions"
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 7:19 PM
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] GIS_Libraries
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Chr
this?
I can't find a license file which indicates this.
>
> What I have missed ?
>
>
> Jérôme
> - Original Message - From: "P Kishor"
> To: "OSGeo Discussions"
> Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 7:19 PM
> Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] GIS_Librar
ot;P Kishor"
To: "OSGeo Discussions"
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 7:19 PM
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] GIS_Libraries
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Christopher Schmidt
wrote:
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 11:55:47AM -0500, P Kishor wrote:
..
Thanks Dan (and Christopher and others
ljana Ilic
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 12:57 PM
To: OSGeo Discussions
Subject: Re: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] GIS_Libraries
Thanks Tyler,
I am looking for Java GIS library, which is capable of working with
various geospatial data
formats: ESRI shapefiles, KML, GML, PostGis, GeoTiff etc.
I am looking for librar
rendering of map too much.
I need to develop desktop application with support for vector maps.
I already look at Geotools library, and i am looking for something similar but
with better rendering performance.
Best regards.
- original message
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] GIS_Libraries
Sent
> -Message d'origine-
> De : discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org [mailto:discuss-
> boun...@lists.osgeo.org] De la part de Tyler Mitchell (OSGeo)
> Envoyé : mardi 5 mai 2009 18:00
> À : OSGeo Discussions
> Objet : Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] GIS_Libraries
>
> On 5-May-09,
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 01:47:32PM -0400, Yves Moisan wrote:
> > >
> > > But if he wants to keep his code under some closed-source license then he
> > > can
> > > not link to or embed any GPL licensed code or library.
>
> Whence licence exceptions e.g. in ExtJS
> (http://extjs.com/products/floss
> >
> > But if he wants to keep his code under some closed-source license then he
> > can
> > not link to or embed any GPL licensed code or library.
Whence licence exceptions e.g. in ExtJS
(http://extjs.com/products/floss-exception.php) to allow using ExtJS
(GPL) with an application/library tha
To: OSGeo Discussions
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] GIS_Libraries
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Christopher Schmidt
wrote:
> On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 11:55:47AM -0500, P Kishor wrote:
.
>>
>> Thanks Dan (and Christopher and others), I see the distinction now
>> between GPL an
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Christopher Schmidt
wrote:
> On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 11:55:47AM -0500, P Kishor wrote:
..
>>
>> Thanks Dan (and Christopher and others), I see the distinction now
>> between GPL and LGPL. However, I am reading the actual GPL text and
>> its extensive FAQ, instead o
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 11:55:47AM -0500, P Kishor wrote:
> On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Daniel Ames wrote:
> > IANAL either, but I do read wikipedia. So by way of clarification...
> > Everything I've read makes a clear distinction between GPL and LGPL such
> > that GPL code can not be embedde
Hi,
Some more precision.
> Let's say ShapeLib is published under GPL (I don't know
> whether or not it is; this is only for illustration purpose).
> Let's say, MapServer utilizes ShapeLib, but doesn't modify
> ShapeLib, but uses ShapeLib as is. Let's say, MapServer's
> creator decides to make
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Daniel Ames wrote:
> IANAL either, but I do read wikipedia. So by way of clarification...
> Everything I've read makes a clear distinction between GPL and LGPL such
> that GPL code can not be embedded in or linked to a closed source
> application. Period. Whereas L
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 10:33:40AM -0600, Daniel Ames wrote:
> IANAL either, but I do read wikipedia. So by way of clarification...
> Everything I've read makes a clear distinction between GPL and LGPL such
> that GPL code can not be embedded in or linked to a closed source
> application. Period. W
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 11:24:47AM -0500, P Kishor wrote:
> On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Daniel Ames wrote:
> > Nenad,
> > The OSGeo projects use a variety of licenses. You'll see LGPL, MPL, GPL,
> > MIT, and others. If you are developing commercial tools, you'll need to
> > avoid GPL (someone
IANAL either, but I do read wikipedia. So by way of clarification...
Everything I've read makes a clear distinction between GPL and LGPL such
that GPL code can not be embedded in or linked to a closed source
application. Period. Whereas L-GPL licensed code can be linked to a closed
source applicati
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Daniel Ames wrote:
> Nenad,
> The OSGeo projects use a variety of licenses. You'll see LGPL, MPL, GPL,
> MIT, and others. If you are developing commercial tools, you'll need to
> avoid GPL (someone correct me if I'm wrong.)
Disclaimer: IANAL. Get legal advice
Nenad,
The OSGeo projects use a variety of licenses. You'll see LGPL, MPL, GPL,
MIT, and others. If you are developing commercial tools, you'll need to
avoid GPL (someone correct me if I'm wrong.)
Also take into consideration development platform/language.
My group (MapWindow project) has a numbe
On 5-May-09, at 6:07 AM, Nenad Milasinovic wrote:
I am interested is there any reliable open source, LGPL licensed
GIS SDK or library suited for building commercial, platform
independent GIS application on top of it.
I am also interested for commercial solutions but only as SDK or
library.
20 matches
Mail list logo
