Chris,
The Ethernet port is fully functional on both wired and wireless
models. On the wireless squeezebox there is an additional menu in setup
to choose which interface you want.
Our main processor has ethernet built-in so there was no reason not to
include it in both models.
Sean
On Mar 1,
Christian Pernegger wrote:
Question...I download a .99 song the other day. It plays fine in
Itunes. But slim wont play it.
Its the AAC protected format?
Yes.
I tried to convert to mp3 but it wouldnt let me. Anyway to play
downloaded/purchased songs
from Itunes store?
You can burn via iTunes,
This is the second alpha release of SlimServer 6.0 -
Lol... I'd just now upgraded my 6.x nightly on a whim and the directory
listing seemed strangely underpopulated... the .tar.gz wer already there
though, so I'm good.
Keep up the awesome work!
C.
___
Hi,
This is the stuff I found on audio synthesis' website...
Following input selection two PLLs are used to extract and purify the word
clock. An electrically and mechanically isolated crystal oscillator forms
part of a sophisticated second order PLL, tightly bandpass filtering the
recovered
Phil Karn wrote:
Perhaps the new Squeezebox model being hypothesized here will support G?
That would be good, expecially if it included an extra RJ45 and a small
Ethernet switch to allow another host to share it.
And a pony. The new squeezebox should definitely include a pony.
:)
- Marc
Please don't use this list as a chat client, take all off-subject
conversation off-list.
The list is flooded already.
Thanks!
On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 08:31:51 -0500, Marc Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Phil Karn wrote:
Perhaps the new Squeezebox model being hypothesized here will support G?
Hi All,
I have some further information regarding this problem.
Late last year I was trying to get a freinds MK1 Audio Synthesis DAX to lock
to my Squeezebox. We saw the same problem, A good lock with MP3 streams,
no lock at all with FLAC.
The Mk1 DAX has a very narrow PLL clock capture window
Who died and made you boss? Whoops, I just contributed to the chatty chat
chat.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jonas Nordström
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 8:03 AM
To: Slim Devices Discussion
Subject: Re: [slim] New
Are you kidding me???
Dude, get a life.
~c
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:discuss-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonas Nordström
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 10:03 AM
To: Slim Devices Discussion
Subject: Re: [slim] New Squeezebox?
Please don't use
Do I spy some flames on the horizon?
Christopher Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 02.03.2005,
17:02:57:
Are you kidding me???
Dude, get a life.
~c
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:discuss-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonas Nordström
Sent:
I want a pony.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 02 March 2005 16:14
To: Slim Devices Discussion
Subject: RE: [slim] New Squeezebox?
Do I spy some flames on the horizon?
Christopher Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Randall Reed wrote:
Need help!
I am running all of my itunes music and the xml library from a server -
ex. S:\Music (network map). All of the paths in the xml file point to
the s:\ drive which is cool. However, slimserver doesn't like mapped
drives - it seems. Can a fix be considered? or
Steinar Bjaerum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi.
I investigated the bit-correctness of the digital output of Squeezebox
using
the DTS encoded as WAV method:
I downloaded a DTS sample file encoded as a 44.1kHz WAV file.
I made a second version of the file where
On Mar 2, 2005, at 8:23 AM, Dan Goodinson wrote:
I want a pony.
Please file a feature request on http://bugs.slimdevices.com
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
lol,
I guess I was wrong ...
On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 08:45:41 -0800, Jack Coates [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dean blackketter wrote:
On Mar 2, 2005, at 8:23 AM, Dan Goodinson wrote:
I want a pony.
Please file a feature request on http://bugs.slimdevices.com
Wouldn't that be an enhancement request?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
dean blackketter
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 9:32 AM
To: Slim Devices Discussion
Subject: Re: [slim] New Squeezebox?
On Mar 2, 2005, at 8:23 AM, Dan
Jason wrote:
Wouldn't that be an enhancement request?
I did it as an enhancement request -- like all other tracking systems
I've used, bugzilla records ERs and bugs in the same database. Call it
what you will... I like to think of it as meaning that every enhancement
request will eventually
Fantastic - you actually raised it as an enhancement request? :D
And I was only _half_ serious :D :D
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jack Coates
Sent: 02 March 2005 17:00
To: Slim Devices Discussion
Subject: Re: [slim] New Squeezebox?
Hi, everyone.
I've enjoyed being a part of this mailing list and plan to continue with
it. I do find it easier to stay on top of things when the messages land
in my 'slim' inbox. BUT...
There is a project called WikiCities that the creator of the Wikipedia
has begun. How much interest is
* Damon Riley shaped the electrons to say...
Yes, there are ups and downs to this, but what is there to lose,
really? WikiCities lets us use their software servers to run the wiki
and they get to place ads on the site. The content is free to anyone.
Damon - we already have a wiki at:
For the record it is located at:
http://wiki.slimdevices.com/tiki-index.php
Craig, James (IT) wrote:
There is already a Wiki on SlimDevices web site.
Not much on it though...
James
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Damon Riley
Sent:
* Jason shaped the electrons to say...
This might be a stupid question, but is there a readme, etc, that explains
what all has to be installed to make this work? I'm guessing I will have to
load SQL of some flavor and possibly a new Perl version on my Linux machine
to have a go at this new
(ppc-linux 5.6)
What OS and perl version are you running?
-D
--
Fedora Core 2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# uname -a
Linux jaberwock 2.6.5-1.358 #1 Sat May 8 09:04:50 EDT 2004 i686 i686 i386
GNU/Linux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]#
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# perl -v
This is perl, v5.8.3 built for
Jack Coates wrote:
dean blackketter wrote:
On Mar 2, 2005, at 8:23 AM, Dan Goodinson wrote:
I want a pony.
Please file a feature request on http://bugs.slimdevices.com
http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918
Just voted for this.
:)
R.
--
http://robinbowes.com
Also, is it recommended to uninstall the previous version or will this
successfully install over the top via RPM?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Sully
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 10:37 AM
To: Slim Devices Discussion
on 2/3/05 1:31 pm, Marc Sherman wrote
And a pony. The new squeezebox should definitely include a pony.
Doesn't seem unreasonable, given that there are other MP3 playing devices
that include a cat:
http://www.techjapan.com/Article903.html
About using the list as a chat client? Not necessarily. I have 13534
unread messages here that say you might be right. OTOH, if by wrong
you mean making a request guaranteed to provoke snotty answers, then
yes. BTW, you are top-posting.
Phil Nelson
Jonas Nordström wrote:
lol,
I guess I was
I think the reason no-one adds to the Wiki is it's a bit too um...
offputting? at the moment.
If the Slim staff were to add some hints as to where contributions are
wanted I'm sure people would pitch in.
At the moment it just looks like the website content to me.
James
-Original
Hello. I've been trying to get the 6.0 nightlies to work on a Centos (RH
Enterprise) server. The software installs fine, but crashes silently part way
through scanning my library. The crash occurs about 10 minutes into the scan.
5.4.X works fine on the same system and library. If I remove the
Since you removed 6.0 and installed 5.4xx, could you please tell me if you
had to do something special with the firmware or did you get the firmware
back which belong to 5.4x.
I believe that the firmware is updated in 6.0 from the firmware version in
5.4x. Is this right?
Kind Regards
Tore
Thanks kdf
Tore
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För kdf
Skickat: den 2 mars 2005 19:29
Till: Slim Devices Discussion
Ämne: Re: SV: [slim] SlimServer 6.0a2 scan problems
Quoting Tore Johnsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Since you removed 6.0 and
I don't care... I'm not buying another SB until they get the Pony
enhancement worked out...
802.11g
Larger buffer
New processor with native FLAC decoding
bit-accurate stream with no phase-inversion
And last but not least - a new form factor, possibly a standard
component size with a larger
Quoting kdf [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Quoting Tore Johnsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Since you removed 6.0 and installed 5.4xx, could you please tell me if you
had to do something special with the firmware or did you get the firmware
back which belong to 5.4x.
I believe that the firmware is
I have two computers on my network, both connected to a router, itself
connected to a cable modem (all wired). This morning I turned on the
server computer (Windows XP), connected the Squeezebox to the router and
installed it. But I omitted to turn on the second computer (Windows 98)
Christopher Jacob wrote:
and a hard drive
and a keyboard
and a mouse
Then build yourself a mini-ATX PC, or buy a Mac mini and run Softsqueeze.
The whole point of a Squeezebox is to have a small, light, low-power,
and **fanless** box that just plays music and plays it well. I think the
current
Chip Hart wrote:
...after hearing a few references to Magnatunes here, I decided
to check it out. Cool idea, surprisingly good music. I was
about to work on parsing their WWW pages to extra playlists when
I realized _they'd already done the hard work_ and
Phil Karn wrote:
I don't think so. I did notice that his playlist entries are URLs with
file names that just give the track #, artist and song, no album, year
or comment.
Oh, unless I am misunderstanding you, check this out:
http://magnatune.com/info/api
Look at
Chip Hart wrote:
Oh, unless I am misunderstanding you, check this out:
http://magnatune.com/info/api
Look at the XML and csv files - tons of data. I've got it
parsed and all, what I really struggle with is a cool way to
I guess I wasn't aware of all that stuff.
Then build yourself a mini-ATX PC, or buy a Mac mini and run Softsqueeze.
The whole point of a Squeezebox is to have a small, light, low-power,
and **fanless** box that just plays music and plays it well. I think the
current design is just fine, though it took me a while to get used to
It appears that you have to create a login password to add to it.
It's not as free-wheeling as the site I had in mind.
Craig, James (IT) wrote:
There is already a Wiki on SlimDevices web site.
Not much on it though...
James
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Phil Karn wrote:
The big flaw with this particular measurement (other than the
horizontal sweep has been blown up to greatly exaggerate the problem)
What makes you think that?
Because I can read a scope legend. The scope has been blown up in the
horizontal direction to exaggerate the jitter
Phil Karn wrote:
If you have a typical small home router box with DHCP support (e.g.,
Linksys, Netgear, D-Link, SMC), it will generally let you specify the
range of addresses that it will allocate dynamically. Allocate a
reasonable number of addresses in your subnet to the dynamic pool for
On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 14:00:36 -0800, Phil Karn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The best way is to assign a fixed, static IP address to each host on
your own local network. There's really no point in allocating IP
addresses dynamically to your own hosts given that you have such an
abundant supply of
I have a linksys WRT54G. Can you tell me how to do this? I can find
no setting to allow this in the WRT54G.
Thanks
Jay
On Thu, 03 Mar 2005 00:17:23 +, Robin Bowes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW, all small home router boxes I've used have the facility to fix
DHCP leases, ie. always
On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 19:43:34 -0500, Jay Sissom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a linksys WRT54G. Can you tell me how to do this? I can find
no setting to allow this in the WRT54G.
I also have that router.
The default lease time is a day.
Go to Setup - Basis Setup
Scroll down to DHCP Server
Robin Bowes wrote:
What information on that image tells you that? It seems to me you're not
understanding what you're seeing.
The legend says the time trace is 5 ns/div. A pair of measuring lines
implies that the jitter on the uncorrected is somewhat less than that,
about 3 ns.
As I recall (I
* Mike Marley shaped the electrons to say...
I am running 6.0a2 on a mac running 10.3.8 and am having some weird
behavior. I am having the composer being included with artist problem and I
just want to start from scratch. Does anyone know how to completely remove
every single file that Slim
Phil Karn wrote:
Even if that jitter were directly imposed on the local VCO, which it is
not because of loop filtering, it would still be reduced by a factor of
64 as the VCO clock is divided by 64 to produce the DAC sample clock.
I'm going to have to revise and correct this. (In my defense,
On Mar 2, 2005, at 10:45 AM, Jack Coates wrote:
http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918
+1 on that feature request!
I hope you guys don't get around to doing it too soonI need to
expand my back yard.
___
Discuss mailing list
Thanks, but that isn't what I want to do. I want to make the router
always assign a specific IP address based on the Mac address in my
ethernet card. Robin said all the routers he has seen allow this, so
I would like him to explain it for WRT54G. This is one of the most
popular ones out there.
Jay Sissom wrote:
Thanks, but that isn't what I want to do. I want to make the router
always assign a specific IP address based on the Mac address in my
ethernet card. Robin said all the routers he has seen allow this, so
I would like him to explain it for WRT54G. This is one of the most
Quoting Michael Bowyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Kevin, I'm a Mac user, I double-click things ;)
Double-clicking the installer seems to go through the motions. I install over
5.4.1, and get a new preference pane. I click the pref pane START button, the
button changes to a greyed-out STOP, there's
Absolutely sure - this is definetely a lock/nolock senario.
The same stream fed to another DAC works perfectly.
From: Phil Karn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Slim Devices Discussion discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
To: Slim Devices Discussion discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
Subject: Re: [slim] Modifying
Thanks for the pointers - I should have thought of that myself!
Kind regards
Richard
-Original Message-
From: Michael Herger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 March 2005 07:12
To: Slim Devices Discussion
Subject: Re: [slim] Now Playing information
On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 06:58:18 -,
54 matches
Mail list logo
